PEACE BE UNTO ALL THE TRUTHERS,SEEK KNOWLEDGE FROM CRADLE TO GRAVE

''MAKE SURE TO ALWAYS CLICK ''OLDER POSTS''AS FRONT PAGE DOES NOT CONTAIN '' FULL CONTENTS OF DAILY POSTS AND UPDATES''


Showing posts with label anti mining. Show all posts
Showing posts with label anti mining. Show all posts

Monday, July 8, 2013

Another non-report on human rights and free trade with Colombia

Another non-report on human rights and free trade with Colombia http://www.bilaterals.org/spip.php?article23455 On June 14th, the Canadian government quietly tabled its second report on the human rights impacts of the Canada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement. So quietly, in fact, that even those who had been anticipating its release almost missed it. The report was deposited with the clerk at the end of the day, rather than during routine proceedings in the House.The reporting obligation was enshrined into law in 2010 to address widespread concerns that the FTA would exacerbate the alarming human rights crisis in Colombia. The government has touted the reports as a meaningful way to ensure human rights accountability in trade with the troubled Latin American country.[[[Unfortunately, this latest report’s tone and content — and the quiet way in which it was tabled — seem intent on avoiding scrutiny and leave us wondering what the government is trying to hide.]]]][[[[[[[[[[The report’s narrow scope limits itself to an analysis of actions taken under the FTA’s Implementation Act, the act that governs Canadian domestic implementation of the agreement. By interpreting its reporting obligation this way, the government avoids any examination of the impact of Canadian investment — including oil, gas and mining – in Colombia. This arguably defies the very spirit of the exercise. Canadian extractive interests in Colombia were one of the government’s primary motivations for signing the FTA. They were also the most pressing concern voiced by human rights groups worried about the FTA’s impacts]]]]]]
[ed notes:click link for whole article,just citing two paragraphs..meanwhileabout two weeks ago.. Mining aid The Globe and Mail reports that the minister in charge of the Canadian International Development Agency told a meeting of Canada’s mining industry representatives that he is working to help them take advantage of the “huge opportunities” in poor countries:“In his comments to the Mining Association of Canada, [Julian] Fantino dismissed criticism of the government’s strategy and praised the Canadian extractive industry’s work. ‘Your industry is a leader, internationally, and we want to help you succeed,’ he said.Last fall, Canada established the Canadian International Institute for Extractive Industries and Development, which is meant to help developing countries establish policies to better govern their mining sectors. The institute ‘will be your biggest and best ambassador,’ Mr. Fantino told mining representatives on Wednesday, adding that it would draw on Canadian success in the mining industry and share lessons from Canada with other countries.”
 ------------------------------------------------------------
also read.. Canada's Mining Crimes http://mostlywater.org/canadas_mining_crimes GOLDCORP'S CRIMES www.miningwatch.ca/en/search/node/goldcorp Action Alert: Student Anti-Mining Activist Disappeared www.cispes.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=843&Itemid=1 Canadian Mining Crimes in Mexico http://upsidedownworld.org/main/mexico-archives-79/2602-canadian-mining-crimes-in-mexico
Colombia: For the immediate release of the leaders of ASTRACATOL-FENSUAGRO, victims of mass arrest in Tolima!
 On May 9 the Colombian Army carried out mass arrests in different villages in Tolima against agrarian leaders from the Association of Agrarian Workers of Tolima, ASTRACATOL, an agrarian union member of FENSUAGRO-CUT. These actions were ordered by the local court of Purificación, which accuses them of “aiding subversion” and “rebellion”, for alleged links to the FARC-EP guerrillas. The testimonies for these accusations have been obtained thanks to witnesses on the payroll (through the informers’ network). They are clearly being framed up, in order to repress social protest against mining and hydro-electrical megaprojects in the region


 The eight men arrested: Ramiro Bazurdo Gonzalez, Guillermo Antonio Cano Borja, Floricel Buitrago Cangrejo, Norberto García García, Gonzalo Ernesto Pastor Mora, Constantino Mayorga García, José Guillermo Pacheco Cruz and Edilberto Mayorga García, are all peasants affiliated to ASTRACATOL and they are members of the social and political movement Marcha Patriótica. Guillermo Antonio Cano Borja is the coordinator of the human rights department of ASTRACATOL. He is also in the executive committee of FENSUAGRO, in which capacity  he participated in the Forum on Political Participation organized in Bogotá by the UNDP and the National University on April 28th-30th –there, he contributed to the Peace Negotiations in Havana, Cuba, proposing that in Colombia political participation could be exercised without the risk of being criminalized, threatened, displaced or murdered by State or paramilitary agents.
The exercise of the trade union activity and the defence of agrarian workers’ rights, of life, territory, sovereignty do not constitute a crime. They are a fundamental political right, consecrated in the Constitution of Colombia.ASTRACATOL has suffered since its birth in December 2007 from State and paramilitary violence. Several of its leaders have been murdered. In November 2011 another eight leaders of ASTRACATOL were rounded up in La Marina (Chaparral) and were framed in another trial thanks to the accusations of people which have been proven to be lying. We know that the witnesses against them pose as demobilized guerrillas but there is no official record of their alleged demobilization –they are on the payroll to be used against people that whether the State or companies think are bothersome.The prisoners of La Marina are Edwin Lugo Caballero, José Norbey Lugo Caballero, Arcesio Díaz, Aycardo Morales Guzmán, Saan Maceto Marín, Fredynel Chávez Marín, Alexander Guerrero Castañeda and Armando Montilla Rey. A year and a half later, they are still in prison, suffering from inhuman conditions, while none of the accusations has been proven.These levels of criminalization and political repression against civil society organizations such as ASTRACATOL-FENSUAGRO and Marcha Patriótica demonstrate that while the Colombian government is talking about peace and demanding steps towards peace from the guerrillas, they are increasing military and paramilitary operations against the unarmed population, destroying the lives of thousands of families committed to the construction of a Colombia in peace, where social and political rights are not abused. WE DEMAND FROM THE COLOMBIAN AUTHORITIES:Immediate release of the sixteen leaders of ASTRACATOL on trial without substantial proves, based on false witnesses.To put an end to repression and persecution against ASTRACATOL, Marcha Patriótica and all forms of civilian resistance and opposition in Tolima against mining and hydro-electrical projects which threaten the mass displacement of people from the land where they have their livelihoods, added to irreparable damages to environmentTo stop military harassment against civilian population in the areas of “military consolidation”.To stop collusion with paramilitary criminal gangs that do the “dirty work”, threatening, murdering and displacing people that are a bother to economic interests or to the State.We need effective guarantees for the exercise of political and union rights, for freedom of expression, meeting and association in Colombia, according to our Constitution, so we can talk about political participation and rule of law without this sounding like a cruel joke against the population.UPDATE After this letter was written, the eight prisoners in Astracatol indicted by the Court in Purificación have been placed under house arrest. This In no way changes our protest nor does it make this judicial persecution less abominable. We demand the immediate and unconditional release of all detainees.

Wednesday, June 26, 2013



Africa, let us help – just like in 1884
 The New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition, which bears only a passing relationship to the agreements arising from the Conference of Berlin, will, according to the US agency promoting it, "lift 50 million people out of poverty over the next 10 years through inclusive and sustained agricultural growth". This "inclusive and sustained agricultural growth" will no longer be in the hands of the people who are meant to be lifted out of poverty. How you can have one without the other is a mystery that has yet to be decoded. But I'm sure the alliance's corporate partners – Monsanto, Cargill, Dupont, Syngenta, Nestlé, Unilever, Itochu, Yara International and others – could produce some interesting explanations.The alliance offers African countries public and private money (the UK has pledged £395m of foreign aid) if they strike agreements with G8 countries and the private sector (in many cases multinational companies). Six countries have signed up so far.That African farming needs investment and support is indisputable. But does it need land grabbing? Yes, according to the deals these countries have signed. Mozambique, where local farmers have already been evicted from large tracts of land, is now obliged to write new laws promoting what its agreement calls "partnerships" of this kind. Ivory Coast must "facilitate access to land for smallholder farmers and private enterprises" – in practice evicting smallholder farmers for the benefit of private enterprises. Already French, Algerian, Swiss and Singaporean companies have lined up deals across 600,000 hectares or more of this country's prime arable land. These deals, according to the development group Grain, "will displace tens of thousands of peasant rice farmers and destroy the livelihoods of thousands of small traders". Ethiopia, where land grabbing has been accompanied by appalling human rights abuses, must assist "agriculture investors (domestic and foreign; small, medium and larger enterprises) to ... secure access to land".And how about seed grabbing? Yes, that too is essential to the wellbeing of Africa's people. Mozambique is now obliged to "systematically cease distribution of free and unimproved seeds", while drawing up new laws granting intellectual property rights in seeds that will "promote private sector investment". Similar regulations must also be approved in Ghana, Tanzania and Ivory Coast.The countries that have joined the New Alliance will have to remove any market barriers that favour their own farmers. Where farmers comprise between 50% and 90% of the population, and where their livelihoods are dependent on the non-cash economy, these policies – which make perfect sense in the air-conditioned lecture rooms of the Chicago Business School – can be lethal.Strangely missing from New Alliance agreements is any commitment on the part of G8 nations to change their own domestic policies. These could have included farm subsidies in Europe and the US, which undermine the markets for African produce; or biofuel quotas, which promote world hunger by turning food into fuel. Any constraints on the behaviour of corporate investors in Africa (such as the Committee on World Food Security's guidelines on land tenure) remain voluntary, while the constraints on host nations become compulsory. As in 1884, powerful nations make the rules and weak ones ones abide by them: for their own good, of course.The west, as usual, is able to find leaders in Africa who have more in common with the global elite than with their own people. In some of the countries that have joined the New Alliance, there were wide-ranging consultations on land and farming, whose results have been now ignored in the agreements with the G8. The deals between African governments and private companies were facilitated by the World Economic Forum, and took place behind closed doors.
[ED NOTE:CLICK LINK FOR MORE..

 



Impunity Inc. Reflections on the “super-rights” and “super-powers” of corporate capital http://www.tni.org/sites/www.tni.org/files/download/impunity_inc_0.pdf
Forty years after Salvador Allende(overthrown and assassinated by cia) denounced corporate power at the United Nations General Assembly (December 1972), millions of people all over the world are involved in struggles against the social and environmental injustice generated by transnational corporations.Working together or in parallel, in multiple ways, and in all sectors of the economy, people are defending their territories, seeds, water, forests, food, biodiversity, health, culture, etc., from the aggressive actions of the transnational corporations, which expand their power in a system of “accumulation by dispossession.”
Impunity Inc. is a report produced as part of the Global Campaign to Dismantle Corporate Power and Stop Impunity. Through three case studies, it aims to provide inputs for reflection on the “super-rights” and “super-powers” of transnational corporations. The report describes the abuses and violations of fundamental labour rights taking place on a day-to-day basis in the export-oriented garment factories in Morocco, highlighting the responsibility of the Spanish transnational Inditex. It outlines a similar situation in Nicaragua, focusing on the role of Pescanova. In both cases, it explains how all this occurs in the framework of the Association Agreements imposed by the European Union (EU), in a context where Lex Mercatoria and the protection of corporate interests continue to take priority over the basic needs of human beings. The report also looks at Europe’s social metabolism, examining the consequences of the EU’s substantial dependence on the increasingly strategic raw materials that it imports from impoverished countries. The cases of zinc mining in Bolivia, coal mining in Colombia and cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo, together with soya and sugar cane production in Argentina and Brazil, are used to illustrate the harmful impact of Glencore’s operations, analysing the extent to which trade agreements ensure the impunity of the large corporations. Glencore’s involvement in financial speculation on commodities is also described. Impunity Inc. then goes on to look at the physical scaffolding of free trade, focusing on the roll-out of the infrastructure mega-projects in South America (IIRSA-COSIPLAN), and highlighting the European Investment Bank (EIB) involvement, as well as European capital’s responsibility in these infrastructure projects and their financialisation. A separate section is devoted to the case of the mega-dams being built on the River Madeira in the Amazon, with the participation of Banco Santander, GDF-Suez, Abengoa, Voith, Siemens and other European companies.
SAMPLE:  Chapter 2 delves into Europe’s social metabolism to examine the EU’s substantial dependence on the import of increasingly strategic raw materials from impoverished countries. It describes the structure of exports from South America and Africa to Europe and how this keeps these countries in the role of primary commodity exporters and thus in poverty. Emphasising that raw materials are important to capital not only from the metabolic point of view but also on the business side, the chapter describes how European companies are consolidating their monopoly position and their control of the international trade in raw materials. They use Europe as a political platform to ensure that their interests are defended through its “raw materials diplomacy,” but it is also the destination for their products. This is why they are particularly interested in maintaining the model of consumption and capitalist production that currently prevails in the EU. By examining Glencore’s mining operations in Colombia, Bolivia and the Democratic Republic of Congo, on which the EU’s metabolism depends, the chapter describes how a giant transnational like this is able to obtain enormous profits while also provoking serious social and environmental conflicts. A review of its activities in MERCOSUR countries, where it has taken over thousands of hectares of fertile land, provides evidence of Glencore’s control over practically the entire chain of production, under the “vertical integration” model imposed by agribusiness. When Free Trade Agreements, EPAs and AAs are placed under the microscope as they relate to this company, it becomes clear how they benefit it and only serve to increase its hegemony and impunity. Finally, the chapter describes Glencore’s operations in different areas of the economy, focusing on its role in financial speculation on commodities.

Reflections on the “super-rights” and “super-powers” of corporate capital

Observatorio de la Deuda en la Globalitzación (ODG) & Transnational Institute (TNI)

Forty years after Salvador Allende denounced corporate power at the United Nations General Assembly (December 1972), millions of people all over the world are involved in struggles against the social and environmental injustice generated by transnational corporations. Working together or in parallel, in multiple ways, and in all sectors of the economy, people are defending their territories, seeds, water, forests, food, biodiversity, health, culture, etc., from the aggressive actions of the transnational corporations, which expand their power in a system of “accumulation by dispossession.” - See more at: http://www.bilaterals.org/spip.php?article23385#sthash.Gilqjk89.dpuf

Impunity Inc.
Reflections on the “super-rights” and “super-powers” of corporate capital

Observatorio de la Deuda en la Globalitzación (ODG) & Transnational Institute (TNI)

Forty years after Salvador Allende denounced corporate power at the United Nations General Assembly (December 1972), millions of people all over the world are involved in struggles against the social and environmental injustice generated by transnational corporations. Working together or in parallel, in multiple ways, and in all sectors of the economy, people are defending their territories, seeds, water, forests, food, biodiversity, health, culture, etc., from the aggressive actions of the transnational corporations, which expand their power in a system of “accumulation by dispossession.”
Impunity Inc. is a report produced as part of the Global Campaign to Dismantle Corporate Power and Stop Impunity. Through three case studies, it aims to provide inputs for reflection on the “super-rights” and “super-powers” of transnational corporations.
The report describes the abuses and violations of fundamental labour rights taking place on a day-to-day basis in the export-oriented garment factories in Morocco, highlighting the responsibility of the Spanish transnational Inditex. It outlines a similar situation in Nicaragua, focusing on the role of Pescanova. In both cases, it explains how all this occurs in the framework of the Association Agreements imposed by the European Union (EU), in a context where Lex Mercatoria and the protection of corporate interests continue to take priority over the basic needs of human beings. The report also looks at Europe’s social metabolism, examining the consequences of the EU’s substantial dependence on the increasingly strategic raw materials that it imports from impoverished countries. The cases of zinc mining in Bolivia, coal mining in Colombia and cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo, together with soya and sugar cane production in Argentina and Brazil, are used to illustrate the harmful impact of Glencore’s operations, analysing the extent to which trade agreements ensure the impunity of the large corporations. Glencore’s involvement in financial speculation on commodities is also described. Impunity Inc. then goes on to look at the physical scaffolding of free trade, focusing on the roll-out of the infrastructure mega-projects in South America (IIRSA-COSIPLAN), and highlighting the European Investment Bank (EIB) involvement, as well as European capital’s responsibility in these infrastructure projects and their financialisation. A separate section is devoted to the case of the mega-dams being built on the River Madeira in the Amazon, with the participation of Banco Santander, GDF-Suez, Abengoa, Voith, Siemens and other European companies…
- See more at: http://www.bilaterals.org/spip.php?article23385#sthash.Gilqjk89.dpuf


Impunity Inc.
Reflections on the “super-rights” and “super-powers” of corporate capital

Observatorio de la Deuda en la Globalitzación (ODG) & Transnational Institute (TNI)

Forty years after Salvador Allende denounced corporate power at the United Nations General Assembly (December 1972), millions of people all over the world are involved in struggles against the social and environmental injustice generated by transnational corporations. Working together or in parallel, in multiple ways, and in all sectors of the economy, people are defending their territories, seeds, water, forests, food, biodiversity, health, culture, etc., from the aggressive actions of the transnational corporations, which expand their power in a system of “accumulation by dispossession.”
Impunity Inc. is a report produced as part of the Global Campaign to Dismantle Corporate Power and Stop Impunity. Through three case studies, it aims to provide inputs for reflection on the “super-rights” and “super-powers” of transnational corporations.
The report describes the abuses and violations of fundamental labour rights taking place on a day-to-day basis in the export-oriented garment factories in Morocco, highlighting the responsibility of the Spanish transnational Inditex. It outlines a similar situation in Nicaragua, focusing on the role of Pescanova. In both cases, it explains how all this occurs in the framework of the Association Agreements imposed by the European Union (EU), in a context where Lex Mercatoria and the protection of corporate interests continue to take priority over the basic needs of human beings. The report also looks at Europe’s social metabolism, examining the consequences of the EU’s substantial dependence on the increasingly strategic raw materials that it imports from impoverished countries. The cases of zinc mining in Bolivia, coal mining in Colombia and cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo, together with soya and sugar cane production in Argentina and Brazil, are used to illustrate the harmful impact of Glencore’s operations, analysing the extent to which trade agreements ensure the impunity of the large corporations. Glencore’s involvement in financial speculation on commodities is also described. Impunity Inc. then goes on to look at the physical scaffolding of free trade, focusing on the roll-out of the infrastructure mega-projects in South America (IIRSA-COSIPLAN), and highlighting the European Investment Bank (EIB) involvement, as well as European capital’s responsibility in these infrastructure projects and their financialisation. A separate section is devoted to the case of the mega-dams being built on the River Madeira in the Amazon, with the participation of Banco Santander, GDF-Suez, Abengoa, Voith, Siemens and other European companies…
- See more at: http://www.bilaterals.org/spip.php?article23385#sthash.Gilqjk89.dpuf
Impunity Inc.
Reflections on the “super-rights” and “super-powers” of corporate capital

Observatorio de la Deuda en la Globalitzación (ODG) & Transnational Institute (TNI)

Forty years after Salvador Allende denounced corporate power at the United Nations General Assembly (December 1972), millions of people all over the world are involved in struggles against the social and environmental injustice generated by transnational corporations. Working together or in parallel, in multiple ways, and in all sectors of the economy, people are defending their territories, seeds, water, forests, food, biodiversity, health, culture, etc., from the aggressive actions of the transnational corporations, which expand their power in a system of “accumulation by dispossession.”
Impunity Inc. is a report produced as part of the Global Campaign to Dismantle Corporate Power and Stop Impunity. Through three case studies, it aims to provide inputs for reflection on the “super-rights” and “super-powers” of transnational corporations.
The report describes the abuses and violations of fundamental labour rights taking place on a day-to-day basis in the export-oriented garment factories in Morocco, highlighting the responsibility of the Spanish transnational Inditex. It outlines a similar situation in Nicaragua, focusing on the role of Pescanova. In both cases, it explains how all this occurs in the framework of the Association Agreements imposed by the European Union (EU), in a context where Lex Mercatoria and the protection of corporate interests continue to take priority over the basic needs of human beings. The report also looks at Europe’s social metabolism, examining the consequences of the EU’s substantial dependence on the increasingly strategic raw materials that it imports from impoverished countries. The cases of zinc mining in Bolivia, coal mining in Colombia and cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo, together with soya and sugar cane production in Argentina and Brazil, are used to illustrate the harmful impact of Glencore’s operations, analysing the extent to which trade agreements ensure the impunity of the large corporations. Glencore’s involvement in financial speculation on commodities is also described. Impunity Inc. then goes on to look at the physical scaffolding of free trade, focusing on the roll-out of the infrastructure mega-projects in South America (IIRSA-COSIPLAN), and highlighting the European Investment Bank (EIB) involvement, as well as European capital’s responsibility in these infrastructure projects and their financialisation. A separate section is devoted to the case of the mega-dams being built on the River Madeira in the Amazon, with the participation of Banco Santander, GDF-Suez, Abengoa, Voith, Siemens and other European companies…
- See more at: http://www.bilaterals.org/spip.php?article23385#sthash.Gilqjk89.dpuf

Monday, June 24, 2013

No. 486: Miradas del movimiento afrolatinoamericano
http://alainet.org/publica/alai486w.pdf
Cuál es la situación actual y las tendencias de los movimientos afrodescendientes en la región?, Qué tanto han avanzando en la construcción de una agenda para lograr sociedades sin racismo ni discriminación? A responder estas preguntas está dedicada esta edición
Contenido: Cuál agenda afrodescendiente?...Jesús Chucho García
África y los africanos en el espejo de los demás...  Mbuyi Kabunda
La certeza de la política afroprogresista ...Agustín Lao
Las mujeres afrodescendientes en el proceso bolivariano..Esther Pineda G.
Dimensiones de la afrocolombianidad en coyuntura de paz...Aiden Salgado Cassiani
La lucha contra el racismo en Cuba, una visión desde adentro...Silvio Castro
Inclusión de los afrodescendientes del Perú:Un olvido in-voluntario Oswaldo Bilbao Lobaton
La afroderecha también existe ...Diógenes Díaz
Declaración del IV Encuentro Internacional Afrodescendientes y Transformaciones Revolucionarias en América Latina y el Caribe

[ed notes:in english only,these publications contain various themes on latin american affairs..you can use a translator and get it in english,due to volume i cant sit and translate these,wish i could they are priceless fountains of research on vital issues affecting western hemisphere in latin american affairs...

Sunday, June 16, 2013

Popularizing new neo-colonial governance processes for African minerals?
An analysis of Canada’s North-South Institute’s ‘Governing Natural Resources for Africa’s Development’ conference http://www.pambazuka.org/en/category/features/87799

Thursday, April 11, 2013

The U.S. War on Communism, Drugs, and Terrorism in Colombia
[ed note:this is lengthy so im citing small excerpt only,click link for whole piece...

[[[[[Biological warfare]]]]]
One major objective of Plan Colombia has been the destruction of coca fields by aerial chemical fumigation, thus impacting the cocaine trade at its source. Glyphosate, the chemical substance used to fumigate illicit crops and known by its brand name Roundup, was originally patented and produced by the U.S. agricultural corporation, Monsanto. Monsanto classifies Glyphosate as a “mild” herbicide, but the World Health Organization classified it as “extremely poisonous.” [6] Roundup is sold over the counter in the United States as an herbicide that carries the warning,Roundup will kill almost any green plant that is actively growing. Roundup should not be applied to bodies of water such as ponds, lakes or streams…After an area has been sprayed with Roundup, people and pets (such as cats and dogs) should stay out of the area until it is thoroughly dry…If Roundup is used to control undesirable plants around fruit or nut trees, or grapevines, allow twenty-one days before eating the fruits or nuts. [7]In Colombia, two additives, Cosmo-Flux 411 and Cosmo InD, are added to the lethal cocktail, [[[[[[[[which increase its toxicity four-fold ]]]]] and [[[[[[produce what is known as Roundup Ultra, or as some call it “Colombia’s Agent Orange.”]]]]] [8] In addition, the concentrations in the mixtures prepared by the Colombian military (under the guidance of their U.S. colleagues) are five times stronger than is recognized as safe for aerial application by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). [9] This product is regularly sprayed over inhabited areas, farmland, livestock, and areas of invaluable biodiversity. [10] The National Environmental Justice Advisory Council, a Federal Advisory Committee to the EPA, issued a letter on July 19, 2001 stating, “Aerial spraying of the herbicide has caused eye, respiratory, skin and digestive ailments; destroyed subsistence crops; sickened domestic animals; and contaminated water supplies.” [11] Even anti-drug development projects, including ones funded by USAID, the United Nations, the Colombian government and international NGOs, have been destroyed by fumigation. One of many examples is that of COSURCA, an organic coffee cooperative founded to provide peasant farmers with an alternative to coca cultivation. COSURCA was prepared in 2005 and again in 2007, and ended up destroying the coffee crop and the project’s organic certification for future crops. [12]As well as the clear human health, food security, and environmental risks involved in the fumigation campaign, it has also been a massive failure in achieving its stated goal of eradicating the coca crop. Coca, unlike most other food crops, is quite resistant to aerial spraying of glyphosate. Many farmers, who are destined to have their food crops destroyed are left with few options when coca is all that will grow on their land after the spraying of glyphosate has been applied. Ironically, the fumigation campaign has therefore provided an added stimulus to coca cultivation. [13]  [[[[[[Conclusions]]]]]]
[[[[[[[It is established that U.S. “war on terrorism” policies in Colombia and beyond further alienate the populations of countries, where they are implemented and swell the ranks of the militarized “terrorist” forces the United States claims to be fighting.]]]]]] [[[[[[[ Nevertheless, the purpose of this war, like the war on drugs and the war on communism before it, is the creation of a façade that justifies U.S. economic imperialism.]]]]]]] [[[[[[[[The ‘terrorists,’ therefore, like the ‘narcoguerrillas’, play a crucial role in maintaining this façade. The United States’s Colombia policy is certainly aimed at making sure footed left-wing insurgent groups never have to face the gain of strength or political unity necessary to overthrow the state. These groups are also a necessary to have as an enemy, just as the continuation of the internal conflict is necessary, to justify continued U.S. military training, aid and intrusion in the affairs of the strategically located, oil and resources of this rich Andean state.]]]]]]][ed notes;click link for whole article..p.s. i urge my readers to look or google ,search for a documentary(its also on netflix) called Plan Colombia cashing in on the drug war failure..watch william brownfield(ex amb to Venezuela declare on record theres no proof the areal spraying in Colombia has any negative effects on enviroment,health,and communities,wich documentary then has experts expose as an outrigth lie....
Constitutional Court defends Anti-discrimination Law

Constitutional Court defends Anti-discrimination Law  

Colombia's Constitutional Court on Wednesday struck down a lawsuit disputing the constitutionality of the the Anti-discrimination Law under the grounds that indigenous groups were not adequately consulted.The rejected lawsuit sought to attack the law on the grounds that it failed to consult the indigenous and Afro-Colombian minority groups before its ratification. The court ruled that, in this case, prior consultation with minority communities was not required because the law intended to protect society as a whole. A prior consultation only applies to administrative or legislative measures that directly affect those communities.Law 1482, better known as the Anti-discrimination Law, classifies crimes of a racist, homophobic, or xenophobic nature, as well as genocide denial. It protects the rights of those who may be subject to discrimination based on racial or ethnic status.Another lawsuit, still pending the court's decision, attacks from a different angle. The lawyer Victor Velasquez argues that it is "unconstitutional to incarcerate people for expressing their ideological, religious or moral opinions."
This motion against the Anti-discrimination Law is supported by one of Colombia's most politically powerful and controversial individuals, Inspector General Alejandro Ordoñez. Ordoñez requested that the court repeal the law because he believes it punishes racial, religious and sexual orientation-related discrimination. He claimed that the law, "violates the rights to free expression and religious freedom."

related articles Displaced victimized by govt protectors: Inspector General

Bad image
The Antioquia School of Engineering’s Santiago Ortega Arango writes that Canadian mining companies have recently been the targets of popular protests in “at least 10 countries”:
“Canada is very well represented in global mining conflicts because, in large part, Canada is the home of most of the junior mining companies of the world,” says Ramsey Hart, the Canada program co-ordinator at Mining Watch, an Ottawa-based advocacy group.The reason for this, he says, is that Canada has a favourable environment for high-risk, speculative investments, the kind that drives international mineral exploration.Unlike the U.S. Alien Tort Statute, which allows foreign citizens to bring American companies to U.S. courts for abuses committed in a foreign country, there are no mechanisms to hold Canadian companies overseas accountable for their social and environmental policies. ‘We’ve just completely dropped that ball,’ Ramsey says.
Chilean court has ordered Canadian mining giant Barrick Gold to suspend construction on its “massive” Pascua-Lama project:“Barrick stock fell 8.6 per cent to a new 52-week low of $24.81 per share on Wednesday after the appeals court said Pascua-Lama should be halted as it reviewed complaints by local communities that the project is polluting groundwater and rivers in the Atacama desert region, one of the driest areas on earth.…A court source in Chile told Reuters that the appeal could take several months, and the dispute will probably end up in the Chilean Supreme Court.…Set at about 5,500 metres above sea level, the project is being built at the peak of the Andes mountain range between Chile and Argentina and is at once lauded as an engineering feat and decried as an environmental scar on ancient and pristine glaciers.”

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

External forces out to kill latest DRC peace effort

BY Antoine Roger Lokongo http://pambazuka.org/en/category/comment/86762
The agreement signed in Addis Ababa last month enjoining states in the region in the search for lasting peace in DRC is a welcome move. But there are powerful external players who want the instability to continue.With 8 million people killed, thousands of women raped, strategic minerals looted, land occupied by an implanted population from Rwanda and hundreds of people forced out of their land into internally displaced people’s camps or fleeing to neighbouring countries in the last 15 years - as a result of successive wars of invasion sometimes directly launched by Rwanda and Uganda, backed by Britain and America, sometimes by proxy armed groups (including local militia) created by Rwanda and Uganda - the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is the greatest tragedy the world has ever known since World War II, as Ignace Gata Mavinga, Congolese ambassador to the UN put it recently. It is generally believed that the new ‘Peace, Security and Cooperation Framework for the DRC and the Great Lakes Region’, signed on 24 February 2013, in Addis-Ababa, by 11 African leaders - including the leaders of Rwanda, Uganda (Museveni sent his vice-president) and the DRC - under the auspices of the African Union and the United Nations will put an end to the 15 years of wars. But those who have ‘created hotbeds of tension in order to generate chaos and thus justify the balkanization of the DRC’, as President Joseph Kabila put it, are not ready to disarm. They are found in the national, regional and international realms.This time, the latest ‘Peace and Security Framework for the DRC and the Great Lakes Region’ especially addressed the external root causes of the tragedy in eastern Congo, namely Rwandan and Uganda, and called on them ‘not to condone or assist or support any form of armed groups’ in the DRC. It is worth mentioning that it also called on the DRC government ‘to continue to implement certain internal reforms, including in the security sector, promote national reconciliation, tolerance and democracy’. INTERVENTION BRIGADE NOT NEUTRAL The deal also paved the way for the deployment of an ‘intervention brigade’ approved by member countries of the International Conference on the Great Lakes Region (ICGR) and those of the Southern Africa Development Community (SADC). The 2,500-strong force will be led by SADC but will rely on the United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUSCO) for logistics. Angola, Malawi, Namibia, Tanzania, Zambia, Lesotho, Mauritius, Zimbabwe and South Africa will commit troops to the force, which was initially expected to be 4,000-strong.The intervention brigade is meant to eliminate all armed groups in the eastern Congo including the Ugandan and Rwandan created M23 group whose advance and capture of Goma, the provincial capital of Congo’s North Kivu Province, in September last year, surprisingly could not be stopped by 17,000 UN peacekeepers already present in the country. As a consequence, hundreds of people have been killed, children conscripted by force, 900,000 people have already been displaced in North Kivu and 2.6 million have now fled their homes across eastern Congo. UGANDA, RWANDA AND THEIR WESTERN BACKERS TRAPPED However, truth has now caught up with the UN, Britain, America… and Rwanda and Uganda have been trapped. Unlike previous bilateral agreements signed just between the DRC and Rwanda or the DRC and Uganda respectively, this time it is a multilateral agreement involving the UN and regional organizations, and Rwanda and Uganda have to cooperate; including by handing over criminals such as Nkunda and Mutebusi who committed crimes against humanity in Congo and who are enjoying themselves either in Rwanda or in Uganda.But these forces, which, we in the DRC, call ‘the international coalition for the distabilisation of Congo’, obviously still have many cards to play on the table. This explains why they are already trying to hold the latest ‘Peace and Security Framework for the Democratic Republic of Congo and The Great Lakes Region’ hostage. Various national, regional and international vested interests are already at work to torpedo the peace process, as usual! As usual because every moment there is a turning point on the horizon in the history of the DRC, it is at this moment that the enemies of the people of Congo realize the weakness of their methods and attempt to strengthen or change them. This time again, they will not let the situation escape them. [[[[This nebula of vested interests, in which you find powerful nations, international figures, multinationals, secret societies and services, non-governmental and intergovernmental organisations and the media, is involved in the fight against peace, stability, reconstruction and socio-economic development of the DRC. It operates at national, regional and international levels.]]]]]
[ed notes;click link for whole article...then also read... FILTHY ZIONIST ISRAHELLI BILLIONAIRE LOOTING CONGO …

http://www.shoah.org.uk/2012/12/09/filthy-zionist-israhelli-billionaire-looting-congo/



Friday, February 15, 2013


Bad suit
The Daily Guide reports that the Africa Centre for Energy Policy is speaking out against efforts by industry lobby groups to get around new US transparency requirements for oil, gas and mining companies operating abroad:In a press release issued recently in Accra and signed by Mohammed Amin Adam, its Executive Director, ACEP said the suit is a betrayal of the move for global transparency in the oil and gas industry by well meaning global citizens and governments.‘We, in Africa, received the news of the issuance of regulations to back the implementation of the Dodd Frank Transparency reforms with great joy because we believe that it would expose corruption and mismanagement of natural resources on our continent.’
…‘It is against this background that ACEP calls on Anadarko, Hess Corporation and Kosmos Energy, who are operating in Ghana, to dissociate themselves from the legal suit by the [American Petroleum Institute] and instead support efforts at enhancing transparency and accountability in the global oil and gas industry,’ it stated.”

Thursday, February 14, 2013

Dominican Republic mining contract challenged
The Justice and Transparency Foundation (FJT), a Dominican civil organization, has filed for an injunction against a contract the government signed with the Toronto-based Barrick Gold Corporation for the Pueblo Viejo gold mine in Cotuí in the Dominican Republic's central province of Sánchez Ramírez. The mine, a joint venture of Barrick and the Vancouver-based multinational Goldcorp Inc., opened last August despite strong opposition from environmental groups. It is set to begin exporting gold in February.According to the FJT, the company expects to make $2 billion from the gold it exports this year, while the Dominican government will only receive $53 million. Over the next 25 years Barrick Gold will get back something like $50 billion on its $3.7 billion initial investment, FJT president Trajano Potentini said on Feb. 4. The country will receive just $1.3 billion, while it will have the sole responsibility for dealing with the mine's damage to the environment. Potentini called legislators who approved the contract "traitors to the country." In addition to the legal filing, the foundation was planning a national day of consciousness-raising around the issue. (Hoy, Santo Domingo, Feb. 4; Adital, Brazil, Feb. 8)

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

well usurp your resources,and here you can
receive a sample of the high-nutritional meals
from US Charge’d Affaires
9 Declarations to Those Who Will Not Listen from the Amerindian Peoples Liberation Front (APLF)
The following appeared on the website Last Real Indians. This is truly an exciting development in so-called Guyana and Onkwehón:we Rising echoes LRI’s comments that this emerging movement is sure to “have an unprecedented effect on the map of indigenous history and the struggle for sovereignty on this hemisphere of the “Americas.” Like the mayan Zapatistas in southern Mexico fighting for self governance and against oblivion, to the Ashuar and Shuar in Ecuador fighting Chevron-Texaco for irreparable damages which have contaminated the soil and water system to the kayapo in the amazon stopping the damming of the Amazon river to IdleNoMore at our own door step, and all the mining and water control troubles across Indian country today.” THE FOLLOWING ARE DECLARATIONS TO THE WORLD BY THE AMERINDIAN PEOPLES LIBERATION FRONT (APLF): DECLARATION #1
In Solidarity with the IdleNoMore movement of North America, the Zapatista Army of National Liberation of Central America, the Movimento Xingu Vivo of South America, and the Siwa Lima Front of the Pacific:We the 9 Amerindian Peoples of Guyana, in Order to better serve our Creator, protect mother Earth, honor our ancestors, establish Justice, insure our domestic peace, provide for our common defence, promote our general welfare, preserve our cultural and biological identities, and secure the blessings of liberty that our ancestors once knew for ourselves and for our future generations yet unborn, do ordain and establish the Amerindian Peoples Liberation Front. DECLARATION #5 ALL mineral and natural resources found on, above, or below Amerindian lands and territories – including water – belong to the Amerindians who occupy or traditionally use those lands & territories IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL INDIGENOUS RIGHTS LAWS & CONVENTIONS, we REJECT the illegal and imagined authority of the Government of Guyana to grant permission to ANYONE to extract ANY mineral or natural resource from Amerindian occupied or traditionally used lands and territories. ONLY the Amerindian peoples have the authority to decide what to do with our mineral and natural resources; and if we decide to sell our mineral and natural resources WE will decide whom we shall do business with at fair market prices and in the most low-impact environmentally sustainable manner possible. “We seek a redress of long-standing imbalances and grievances and we want to create an honest and equitable dialogue between the oppressor and the oppressed, neither do we see armed struggle and guerrilla war as the ONLY way to achieve this solution – but if the Government of Guyana ignores our peaceful and legitimate INTERNATIONAL LAW SUPPORTED demands then it SHALL become our LAST resort! In war the decisive factor is not the military confrontation but the politics at stake in the confrontation. We will not go to war merely to kill or be killed, but we WILL go to war in order to achieve justice and stop our rights being denied and trampled underfoot by the non-indigenous majority who have become deaf to our long standing grievances and drunk with their own illegally exercised and imposed power. The future of our unborn Amerindian generations depends on US the generation of today – to take a final and decisive stand for OUR rights once and for all! The current unjust status quo that relegates us Amerindians to the level of being mere captive onlookers and beggars living with the surface rights of animals only – on gold and diamond rich occupied lands that the Creator saw fit to give to US – that uninvited foreigners have been stealing from under our feet with impunity for over 500 years HAS NOW COME TO AN END! We call on all who stand for Justice and Indigenous rights to support us in our struggle, the ‘frontier’ has been lost almost everywhere else in the world – help us to keep ours – one of the last on God’s green Earth – from the hands of destruction that are desecrating mother Earth! Ours is not the cause of ‘Capitalism’ or ‘Communism’ – we fight for INDIGENISM, a code of honor and harmony with all of creation that ALL of humanity once lived by – for ALL races of men have ancestral roots in an indigenous people somewhere….most have just forgotten this inner truth for technology gradually numbs the soul to unseen realities, do not write in praise of our actions this day after we have become a lifeless example of urbanized mans sad history of inhumanity to native peoples, help us now whilst we yet live – for we are all children of the one God above!
[ed notes:just cited two declarations,click link for all of them.I should note,that recently  a Guyana high court ruled that mining corporations have the right to exploit these peoples land,basically trampling over the international recognized right of the indigenous communities to be consulted in prior and allowed to voice their opposition.. A judge in Guyana's high court ruled Jan. 17 that indigenous groups do not have the right to expel "legal" miners from their lands. The judge, Diana Insanally, found that if the miners in question held a government-approved license then the local community had no right to dispute the operations. The ruling has sparked protests by indigenous groups and is expected to be appealed. "We are deeply disappointed and worried with this ruling and what it means to our village and to Amerindian communities in general," read a press release from the indigenous community Isseneru. "[I]t has serious environmental and social impacts for us. The miners have, for example, brought with them problems related to drugs and prostitution." "We feel that when the high court tells us that we have no rights to decide and control what takes place on our land, then the land is not ours," said the Isseneru statement on the ruling. "Just Friday [Jan. 11], when inquiring at the office of the GGMC [Guyana Geology and Mines Commission], we learnt that our whole land is covered with mining concessions. Yet, the government has not informed us about this." On Jan. 25, some 80 indigenous people protested the ruling outside the office of the president. "If this ruling goes forward then it will be a huge step backwards and will threaten indigenous peoples' rights to land and to self-determination throughout the country," said Jean La Rose of Guyana's Amerindian Peoples Association (APA). (Mongabay, Jan. 29; Forest Peoples Program, Jan. 28; Demerara Waves, Guyana, Jan. 22; Kaieteur News, Jan. 21)

Monday, February 11, 2013

Transnational Capital vs People's Resistance  Download PDF
For transnationals, the crisis brings new opportunities to increase profits and extend their control over all spheres of life on the. Meanwhile, this situation is arousing people's resistance, and the excessive power of these corporations is increasing questioned. .

Sunday, February 10, 2013

Coal mine strike would ‘damage entire world’: Santos
Colombian president Juan Manuel Santos on Friday assigned the Minister of Labor to form a commission in order to address a union strike at Colombia’s most productive mine.BACKGROUND: Colombia's most productive coal mine mired in labor dispute"I have asked the Minister of Labor to personally go to Cerrejon...and do everything possible so that this strike is not successful, that it does not continue, because the damage to the entire world would be very large," said Santos."No one wins, the country loses,” President Santos added. “You lose… because every day that passes [there are] forgone royalties and foregone incomes that for the most part go to social investment.”Workers from the Sintracarbon coal miners union promised companies that operate Colombia’s Cerrejon coal mine that they would go on strike next week if a compromise involving better pay, health and safety conditions were not met."Since November 29th, when we handed over a list of demands to the company, this union has sought that Cerrejon Coal, owned by multinational companies Glencore-Xstrata, Anglo American, and BHP Billiton, recognize justice, fairness, and the legitimacy of [workers'] requests for health and occupational hazard [coverage], dignity of its employees, equity with its contract workers, environmental protection of the Guajira [department], and respect to the communities of the region,"said union representatives of Sintracarbon.The Cerrejon mine is the most productive mine in Colombia, according to local media, and accounts for 59.7% of GDP in the northern Guajira department. Cerrejon Coal is responsible for some 5% of coal sales in the world and employs roughly 12,000 people.[ed notes:so much for Santos claim the strike would damage the''entire world''!they will send in (us funded)anti  riot police(aid thru national colombian police dept/plan integration) to club,possibly even kill  workers should strike take place,these happen almost every few months in Colombia Striking Afro-Colombian Port Workers Attacked by Anti-Riot Police ... Take Action! Striking Sugar Cane Workers in Colombia under Attack ...  Sugar Workers Strike for Basic Rights - Centre Tricontinental - CETRI ESMAD y contraguerrilla agreden a mineros de Suarez (Cauca) ESMAD has also been denounced here, here, here, here and here.)  ...the us govt fully knowledgable of this .still continues the us (repression)assistance...on another note, if the tactical police doesnt put down the strike(colombias workers are very courageous and will figth for their rights),then i assure you these multinational mining corporations will outsource job to paramilitary deathsquads,in wich case the union leaders will be targetted for threats then death ...

Saturday, February 9, 2013

What if Natives Stop Subsidizing Canada? by DRU OJA JAY
DeBeers' open pit mine near
Attawapiskat.PHOTO: WIKIPEDIA.ORG
MONTREAL—There is a prevailing myth that Canada's more than 600 First Nations and native communities live off of money—subsidies—from the Canadian government. This myth, though it is loudly proclaimed and widely believed, is remarkable for its boldness; widely accessible, verifiable facts show that the opposite is true.Indigenous people have been subsidizing Canada for a very long time.Conservatives have leaked documents in an attempt to discredit chief Theresa Spence, currently on hunger strike in Ottawa. Reporters like Jeffrey Simpson and Christie Blatchford have ridiculed the demands of native leaders and the protest movement Idle No More. Their ridicule rests on this foundational untruth: that it is hard-earned tax dollars of Canadians that pays for housing, schools and health services in First Nations. The myth carries a host of racist assumptions on its back. It enables prominent voices like Simpson and Blatchford to liken protesters' demands to "living in a dream palace" or "horse manure," respectively.It's true that Canada's federal government controls large portions of the cash flow First Nations depend on. Much of the money used by First Nations to provide services does come from the federal budget. But the accuracy of the myth ends there.On the whole, the money that First Nations receive is a small fraction of the value of the resources, and the government revenue that comes out of their territories. Let's look a few examples.Barriere Lake The Algonquins of Barriere Lake have a traditional territory that spans 10,000 square kilometres. For thousands of years, they have made continuous use of the land. They have never signed a treaty giving up their rights to the land. [[[[[An estimated $100 million per year in revenues are extracted every year from their territory in the form of logging, hydroelectric dams, and recreational hunting and fishing.]]]]]]]And yet the community lives in third-world conditions. A diesel generator provides power, few jobs are available, and families live in dilapidated bungalows. These are not the lifestyles of a community with a $100 million economy in its back yard. In some cases, governments are willing to spend lavishly. They spared no expense, for example, sending 50 fully-equipped riot police from Montreal to break up a peaceful road blockade with tear gas and physical coercion.Barriere Lake is subsidizing the logging industry, Canada, and Quebec.The community isn't asking for the subsidies to stop, just for some jobs and a say in how their traditional territories are used. They've been fighting for these demands for decades.
[ed notes;click link for more examples....

Friday, February 8, 2013

Interview with Darío Aranda: Extractivism, Resistance, Repression, and Journalism in Argentina
Darío Aranda, I think, is a bit like Rodolfo Walsh. Like Walsh, Aranda has no place on the editorial staff of newspapers and media companies, even those that still fly the flags of the Open Letter to the Military Junta. He still works closely with campesino and Indigenous communities who resist in defense of their ancestral territories and ways of life. He doesn’t tolerate being enclosed in an editorial office, writing or editing what “reliable” news agency cables tell him to write.
[ed note;click link for whole piece..