PEACE BE UNTO ALL THE TRUTHERS,SEEK KNOWLEDGE FROM CRADLE TO GRAVE

''MAKE SURE TO ALWAYS CLICK ''OLDER POSTS''AS FRONT PAGE DOES NOT CONTAIN '' FULL CONTENTS OF DAILY POSTS AND UPDATES''


Thursday, June 27, 2013

Evo Morales Denounces Acts of Conspiracy in Bolivian Foreign Ministry
 President Evo Morales denounced acts of conspiracy and delivery of confidential documents to the United States by workers of Bolivia''s foreign ministry. In an act of possession of new deputy ministers, the president said they have evidence that institution staff violated state secrecy and gave secret information to the U.S. Embassy.In an inauguration ceremony of new deputy ministers, the president said to have evidence that the institution staff has been violating state secrecy and giving secret information to the U.S. Embassy.Morales said he could not understand how Foreign Ministry workers could betray their country and said that the release of documents was not free.Morales made the expose in the inauguration of Institutional Management deputy ministers, Leonor Arauco, who replaces the now deputy minister of Coordination with Social Movements, Alfredo Rada, and deputy minister of Foreign Trade, Clarems Endara, in sustitution of Pablo Guzmรกn, elected general secretary of the Andean Community of Nations.
CURRENT COLOMBIAN AMBASSADOR TO UNITED STATES ILLEGALLY AQUIRED LANDS FOR US CORPORATION http://www.arcoiris.com.co/2013/06/el-embajador-carlos-urrutia-debe-renunciar/
Colombian Ambassador to the  United States , helped U.S. law firm to grab land in Colombia to the U.S. company CARGILL irregularly. Hes lready he worked  against the nation in jis claims before international courts.In the eventual case that Colombia will try to recover the lands of the nation accumulated irregularly by the powerful transnational CARGILL, the current Ambassador of Colombia in the United States will not be defending national interests. The reason: the multinational will remind you that he was part of the firm's lawyers, BRIGARD & URRUTIA, which recommended it to the multinational access through 17 S.A.S., subordinated to four companies created in Colombia but owned by CARGILL, the purchase of more than 26,000 hectares in the Colombian Orinoquia. For this reason, the representative Chamber Wilson Arias has elevated requests to different inspection bodies to investigate on the one hand the behavior of Francisco Josรฉ Uribe Noguera, Advisor to star of the "sophisticated" firm of lawyers, and the own law firm and its remaining members, which included the current  Ambassador CARLOS URRUTIA. But in addition, Arias Castillo raises a request so that the Procurator-General of the nation intervenes and declares such aquisitions illegal.Properties accumulated irregularly: The multinational CARGILL is one of the world's largest multinational food distributor. Their practices have been severely questioned on a global scale. In Colombia it operates through four companies, Colombia Ltda. Cargill, Cargill Trading Ltda. Colombia, Colombia Agro SAS (NIT. 900335836-3) and Black River Colombia SAS, this last namesake of the international investment fund subsidiary of Cargill. [[[According to press information, the horizon of this company is the purchase of 90,000 hectares in Colombia.]]]] So far, it has identified the acquisition of 20 sites that reach 26.060 hectares in the municipalities of Santa Rosalรญa and Cumaribo (Vichada). These transactions were carried out by the 17 SAS already mentioned between 2010 and 2012, and reached a value of $40.016.344.939. 
[ed notes:also read... A Global Threat  Land grabbing in Colombia http://www.terramadre.org/pagine/voci/leggi.lasso?id=C274517218a942C3F6LVBC496635&ln=en
Saudi Wahabi preacher Calls for Killing Shia Women, Children in Iraq 
In his latest statements that have been published on Twitter, the Wahabi sheikh regarded armed terrorist groups as "Mujahids” and urged them to kill any Shia Muslim they capture, no matter if those captured are women or children. The situation in Kirkuk province in northern Iraq is tense and there have been bloody clashes in the area since armed groups intensified their terrorist activities. Al-Drihem’s statements have received strong criticism even in Saudi Arabia. Referring to Al-Drihem’s recent remarks, Abdullah Bin Bukhayt wrote in Saudi paper Ukaz that terrorists have infiltrated Saudi Arabia. Halima Muzaffar, another Saudi journalist, called for Al-Drihem to be tried and sacked from university. "This kind of thought (Al-Drihem’s) is the origin of terrorism and crimes committed in the name of religion,” she said. This is not the first time Al-Drihem makes controversial statements. In July last year, he asserted that Muslims in Najd region of Saudi Arabia are superior to other Muslims in the world. 
[ed notes:point here being, he hasnt yet,nor will he be sacked from his university position...and not even zionist west protests,because that serves their aims and goals as well...

Wednesday, June 26, 2013



Colombia is top heroin supplier for US: UNODC http://colombiareports.com/colombia-is-top-heroin-supplier-for-us-unodc/
In spite of increased competition from Mexico, Colombia continues to be the main supplier of heroin consumed in the United States, said the United Nations’ Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) Tuesday.In its annual report on drug trafficking, the UNODC said that according to statistics provided by Washington, Colombia continues to be the US’ main supplier country of the illicit drug even though it’s dwarfed by Afghanistan and Mexico when it comes to production.
However, according to the UN report, “the available information on heroin production in Colombia and Mexico, two important supply countries for the United States market, is inconsistent and does not fully explain the heroin supply situation in the region, given that the potential cultivation is greater in Mexico, while the United States reports Colombia as its main supplier. 
 Colombia ‘a success story’: US drug czar http://colombiareports.com/colombia-a-success-story-us-drug-czar/
Colombia is “without a doubt” a “success story” in terms of counter-narcotics programs and general public security progress, US Drug Czar Gil Kerlikowske said Wednesday.The chief of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy praised Colombia while in Vienna to attend the presentation of the UNODC’s annual drug trafficking report.


New Qatar Emir Makes First Address, Reveals Cabinet
 Qatari Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani gave his first public speech today since his father officially handed him power over the country yesterday. He began by promising to “continue with his father’s reform agenda and growth projects” and stressing that “the development of human capital was key to the success of Qatar and that he wanted to increase the productivity of the nation, not just its wealth.” On foreign policy matters, he asserted Emir Tamim contended that “Qatar’s new-found position on the world stage should be met with humbleness,” and vowed that  ”as Arabs we reject the splitting of countries on a sectarian basis,” and mentioning that “we are not part of any regional trend against another…Qatar is committed to its promises and relations, but we have a vision and we don’t wait for orders from anyone.” While he did not discuss Qatar’s role in Syria, Libya or Egypt, he “said that Qatar was committed to the cause of Palestine, and would work to end Israeli occupation.”
[ed notes:wow what a load of bs!!!qatar isnt  part of any regional trend against another? didint you just host the us islamic world forum about month ago,whos main speakers were zionists from saban center?wasnt martin indyk us ambassador to israhell and director of that center there?wasnt zionist salman sheihk there? http://thenakedfacts.blogspot.com/2013/06/zionist-qatar-hosts-zionists-at-us.html
so your not hosting zionist ran western powers wich orchestrated war on terror and invaded several muslim countries wich also had Syria on the list? http://thenakedfacts.blogspot.com/2013/01/qatarsaban-center-and-zionist-think.html
your not funding mushrik brotherhood in Egypt and Syria? Your committed to neding israhelli occupation?you just had a trade office and commercial ties with israhell less then 7 years ago!! http://thenakedfacts.blogspot.com/2011/11/qatars-relations-with-israel.html arent you also doing business with Veolia and kratos tied to israhell right now? http://thenakedfacts.blogspot.com/2012/11/zionist-qatar.html
SYRIA WATCH- ISRAHELLI INTELLIGENCE AGENT NISMAN : If Hezbollah Wins Syria Unchecked, Tehran and its ally will emerge more aggressive than ever http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324520904578553380445251720.html 
 By DANIEL NISMAN (ZIONIST AGENT)
daniel nisman
For those who have hoped that the Syrian quagmire might swallow up Iran's influence in the region, it's time to wake up: Tehran and its ally Hezbollah are set to emerge from the Syrian conflict more aggressive than ever.Israel more than most stands to lose from a resurgent Hezbollah. Despite sustaining hundreds of losses in Qusayr alone, [[[[[[[Hezbollah's fighters are gaining valuable combat experience that could be useful in a future conflict with Israeli forces.]]]]]][[[[[[[ After witnessing Hezbollah's ability to capture large swaths of territory in Syria, Jerusalem can no longer shrug off Mr. Nasrallah's threats to invade Israel's Galilee region in the next war.]]]]]]
Iran is also likely to continue leveraging the Assad regime to transport weapons to Hezbollah's coffers, despite threats of additional Israeli airstrikes. Hezbollah's acquisition of Iranian anti-air, anti-ship and surface-to-surface missiles would not only guarantee Mr. Nasrallah long-term military hegemony within and without Lebanon. It would also provide Tehran with a greater deterrent against any future Israeli strike on its nuclear facilities.It's doubtful whether the West fully comprehends the implications of Hezbollah's growing involvement in Syria. The European Union continues to fumble over whether or not to blacklist Hezbollah as a terror group, which would do untold damage to the group's financial operations across the Continent. The U.S., meanwhile, has only begun to warm up to the idea of arming the Syrian rebels.
[ed notes:he means openly as opposed to covertly as they been doing since conflict began,mostly thru allies gcc and turkey...
Rather than confront the looming threat of Hezbollah, Western strategists are still grappling with concerns over which rebel group to arm, or what regime might replace Assad's. They fail to realize that if Hezbollah's involvement continues unchecked, these questions will become irrelevant. The time has come for the West to stop obsessing about the risks of stopping the Assad regime, Hezbollah and Iran, and start considering the consequences of not stopping them.
[ed note: Mr. Nisman is a zionist dog,and a pig,hes posing as journalist is a front,he was a soldier and is now really intelligence operative for israhellunder that guise...now hes the Middle East and North Africa intelligence director at Max Security Solutions, a geopolitical and security risk consulting firm. That firms headquarters are in Israhell tel aviv... Max Security Solutions Ltd.
‎Max Security Solutions Ltd. Max Security is a global leader in provid- ... Tel Aviv 67060,. Israel. Tel: 972-3-6196297. Fax: 972-3-6195852. Max-India. 
[ed note:Wait it gets juicier... Military service  In November 2004, Nisman was drafted in the Israeli Defense Forces, where he was accepted into the Nahal infantry brigade's reconnaissance unit. https://portal.idc.ac.il/en/Argov/Fellows/Pages/Students.aspx During his service, he participated in the 2005 Gaza disengagement, the 2006 Lebanon War, http://www.degania-b.org.il/info/daf-shavua/2006/daf-1938/gvool.htm
 and counter terrorism operations in the West Bank.http://www.friendasoldier.com/en/?page_id=84
---------------------------------------------------------


FSA Commanders on Syria's Future Relations: Iran is Eternal Enemy ...

FSA Commanders on Syria' Future Relations: Iran is Eternal Enemy, Israel Not so Much!



Africa, let us help – just like in 1884
 The New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition, which bears only a passing relationship to the agreements arising from the Conference of Berlin, will, according to the US agency promoting it, "lift 50 million people out of poverty over the next 10 years through inclusive and sustained agricultural growth". This "inclusive and sustained agricultural growth" will no longer be in the hands of the people who are meant to be lifted out of poverty. How you can have one without the other is a mystery that has yet to be decoded. But I'm sure the alliance's corporate partners – Monsanto, Cargill, Dupont, Syngenta, Nestlรฉ, Unilever, Itochu, Yara International and others – could produce some interesting explanations.The alliance offers African countries public and private money (the UK has pledged £395m of foreign aid) if they strike agreements with G8 countries and the private sector (in many cases multinational companies). Six countries have signed up so far.That African farming needs investment and support is indisputable. But does it need land grabbing? Yes, according to the deals these countries have signed. Mozambique, where local farmers have already been evicted from large tracts of land, is now obliged to write new laws promoting what its agreement calls "partnerships" of this kind. Ivory Coast must "facilitate access to land for smallholder farmers and private enterprises" – in practice evicting smallholder farmers for the benefit of private enterprises. Already French, Algerian, Swiss and Singaporean companies have lined up deals across 600,000 hectares or more of this country's prime arable land. These deals, according to the development group Grain, "will displace tens of thousands of peasant rice farmers and destroy the livelihoods of thousands of small traders". Ethiopia, where land grabbing has been accompanied by appalling human rights abuses, must assist "agriculture investors (domestic and foreign; small, medium and larger enterprises) to ... secure access to land".And how about seed grabbing? Yes, that too is essential to the wellbeing of Africa's people. Mozambique is now obliged to "systematically cease distribution of free and unimproved seeds", while drawing up new laws granting intellectual property rights in seeds that will "promote private sector investment". Similar regulations must also be approved in Ghana, Tanzania and Ivory Coast.The countries that have joined the New Alliance will have to remove any market barriers that favour their own farmers. Where farmers comprise between 50% and 90% of the population, and where their livelihoods are dependent on the non-cash economy, these policies – which make perfect sense in the air-conditioned lecture rooms of the Chicago Business School – can be lethal.Strangely missing from New Alliance agreements is any commitment on the part of G8 nations to change their own domestic policies. These could have included farm subsidies in Europe and the US, which undermine the markets for African produce; or biofuel quotas, which promote world hunger by turning food into fuel. Any constraints on the behaviour of corporate investors in Africa (such as the Committee on World Food Security's guidelines on land tenure) remain voluntary, while the constraints on host nations become compulsory. As in 1884, powerful nations make the rules and weak ones ones abide by them: for their own good, of course.The west, as usual, is able to find leaders in Africa who have more in common with the global elite than with their own people. In some of the countries that have joined the New Alliance, there were wide-ranging consultations on land and farming, whose results have been now ignored in the agreements with the G8. The deals between African governments and private companies were facilitated by the World Economic Forum, and took place behind closed doors.
[ED NOTE:CLICK LINK FOR MORE..

 

 TURKISH TORTURE STATE AND NATO PROTECTED The Turkish Spring: Lawyers Rounded Up http://www.jurist.org/forum/2013/06/marjorie-cohn-turkey-protests.php 
 These arrests, detentions, and seizure of property—including confidential client files—violate the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The cases are pending in the Special Heavy Penal Courts, which have jurisdiction over "terrorism" proceedings. Their use of secret evidence and repressive procedures have been condemned by several international and regional human rights monitoring bodies and mechanisms. The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers, Gabriela Knaul, who recently visited Turkey, strongly criticized [PDF] the Special Heavy Penal Courts, saying their "special authority" does not comply with human rights standards on fair trial, and they should therefore be abolished.A group of 500 lawyers who went to the courthouse to protest the lawyers' detention in January were assaulted by police. The Istanbul Bar Association lambasted the unlawful raids as an "explicit attack towards the legal profession and its honor, as well as the people's right to legal remedies."''When I visited Istanbul as a representative of IADL in April, I met with officers of the Istanbul Bar Association, and I spoke with lawyers who had been arrested and released after the January raid. Some are members of CHD. Many specialize in defending victims of torture, arbitrary detention, extrajudicial executions, police brutality and other human rights violations. They also provide free legal assistance in terrorism-related cases, and those involving freedom of expression or protection of the environment. Because of their work in defending clients who challenge government policies, CHD lawyers have been targeted by the government and the police.Knual also reaffirmed the principle that a government should not identify lawyers with the causes of their clients. The United Nations Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers mandate that governments ensure lawyers are able to perform their professional functions without intimidation, hindrance, harassment or improper interference. They also provide that lawyers shall not be identified with their clients or their clients' causes as a result of discharging their functions. The president of the Istanbul Bar Association has been accused of contempt of court for protesting the January detentions of lawyers. According to the 2010 US State Department country report on Turkey, there are more than 10,000 people suspected of "terrorism" in Turkey (one-third of the world's terrorism suspects). Several hundred students, as well as army officials, journalists, lawyers, academics, Kurdish activists, nationalist activists, soldiers and members of the Turkish parliament are in prison, Gulay said. Marjorie Cohn is a Professor of Law at Thomas Jefferson School of Law, past president of the National Lawyers Guild, and deputy secretary general of the International Association of Democratic Lawyers. Her next book, "Drones and Targeted Killing," will be published in 2014 by University of California Press.-------------------------------------------------------
"NATO is one of the essential dimensions of Turkish foreign and defence policy. Turkey has been an important member of the Alliance and a reliable Ally for 60 years." Ambassador Haydar Berk, Permanent Representative of Turkey to the North Atlantic Council
Syria : The Faces Behind The Terror
By Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich
In her extraordinarily bold and direct speech addressed to the Irish Parliament, Clare Daly (TD, Dublin North) called Obama a “war criminal” and “hypocrite of the century” . In describing the fawned reception of Obama in Ireland akin to pimping and prostituting of that nation, Ms. Daly hit the nail on the head
[click link for more...
Lyndon LaRouche Declares: Only Preemptive Bankruptcy Action Against British Can Save The United States by Lyndon LaRouche (LPAC) http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2013/06/26/lyndon-larouche-declares-only-preemptive#more25081
As the result of a careful review of two recent documents publicly released by JP Morgan Chase and the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), the following urgent call to action has been issued by Lyndon LaRouche through the LaRouche Political Action Committee (LPAC):Over the last three weeks, you’ve had several explicit statements of intent, from a major faction of the British-European oligarchy. The first was the J.P. Morgan research paper published May 28th which laid out a perspective for the Eurozone.[1] In this 16-page document, they said: We’re halfway there to the establishment of a bankers’ dictatorship over a single-currency European region which no longer has any degree of national sovereignty; and to complete the process, we’ve got to crush any resistance to establishing a dictatorship over all of Europe, an austerity fascist dictatorship, effectively on the model of what was done, at the initiative of the Bank of England and the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in the 1930s with the bankrolling of Hitler and the Nazis by the likes of Montagu Norman, Prescott Bush and Averell Harriman. In this document the authors from the JP Morgan London office are very explicit, very transparent that the big problem areas within the Eurozone, are Italy and Germany, in part because of certain residual anti-fascist features of the immediate postwar Constitution in Germany, and impulses in that direction in Italy; but that, basically, this has to be crushed.
Why is international media ignoring current protests in Bulgaria?
Bulgarians have been out on the streets for a week by the thousands but with very few exceptions, international media outlets have chosen not to cover the protests. - On the surface, the decision makes sense. People in Sofia took to the streets a week ago today after Delyan Peevski – a well known oligarch, media mogul and politician – was appointed chief of Bulgaria’s State Agency for National Security. The appointment was rushed through and before anybody even knew he was up for the position, Peevski was already giving interviews and sharing his vision for the office. Bulgarians wouldn’t have it. Organizing on Facebook and Twitter, people took to the streets and within 24 hours of the first protest, Prime Minister Oresharski had already retracted the appointment. Why cover a protest that seems to be directed at a very specific person, who was appointed to a very specific position and, especially, after the appointment has already been retracted? This is not news. For a Western audience, the story was over before it even started.
LEBANON WATCH- Report: Van Passengers Stabbed in Sin el-Fil (HARIRI - TAKFIRI GOONS?) http://www.naharnet.com/stories/en/88276-report-van-passengers-stabbed-in-sin-el-fil

Around 25 people riding a van in the area of Jisr al-Wati in Sin el-Fil were attacked with knives on Wednesday by several assailants, the state-run National News Agency reportedNNA said that [[[[[the passengers, who included Lebanese, Palestinians and Syrians, were heading to a studio to participate in a TV show when they were intercepted by eight assailants riding two vehicles]]]]].The suspects then stabbed nine of them, it said, and escaped towards the area of al-Adlieh and from there to Beirut's southern suburbs.The a[[[[[[gency had earlier reported that Iranian television staff were assaulted.]]]]][[[[[NNA said the crew were in two vans on a job mission in Jisr al-Wati where Souk al-Ahad is located when the unknown assailants stabbed them.But the Iranian embassy denied that any of its nationals was assaulted.]]]]]
[ed notes:NNA says they escaped towards southern suburbs? mowaten breaks it down...
mowaten 26 June 2013, 08:13 this quote was added in the article after my first comment, but it is very suspicious. do you know where sin el fil is? you know how far it is from the southern suburb? from the jisr el wati i wonder how one can know they took the direction of "al adlieh" then the southern suburb, unless they followed them. this would mean passing next to souk el ahad, turning around the fiat, going left towards adlieh, [[[[[[then crossing a roudabout right in front of prison and courthouse, always full of cops, taking a boulevard that crosses in front of a ministry, going through the constantly traffic-jammed MC Donald crossroad at the beginning of furn el chabbak street, then passing another roudabout at tayyouneh to finally be on the highway leading to the southern subburd. and which also happens to lead to saida]]]]]]]. so tell me, how do we know they took that road and didnt continue till saida? did the NNA journalist follow them all that way? (if yes, how come he was on the scene of the attack before it happened?) or did the police follow them? and if so how come they didnt manage to catch them while passing all these roundabouts that have heavy police presence?

The International Peace in Syria Initiative Meets with Government and Opposition in Damascus and Lebanon http://www.antiimperialista.org/peace_mission_syria
This international initiative is composed of prominent civil society figures from Europe and Latin America (list attached) representing all those concerned with peace and justice in Syria. Its aim is to contribute to the end of the war and the suffering by helping create favourable conditions for the advancement of the political process through dialogue and negotiations.In order to achieve such an aim, we met with State officials at high levels and various groups and parties of the opposition inside and outside the country, along with religious organizations and international and non-governmental bodies.We have been received, have been informed on the aspects and essence of the conflict, and have been heard.On the basis of the discussions held, the Initiative identified key areas of agreement and drew the following conclusions:1 The conflict cannot be solved by military means.2 There is a need for a viable political solution based on dialogue and negotiations and aiming at drawing up a political transitional framework.3
A sectarian war is now in the making and there is a real possibility of it becoming transnational, making peace all that more urgent.4 The conflict has had a catastrophic impact on the Syrian people as 6.8 million people are in need of assistance, according to interviewed United Nations officials.5 The inflow and funding of weapons, soldiers, foreign fighters and militia from the outside aimed at continuing the war must all stop.6 The embargo has increased misery among the population and is a factor, among others, affecting the delivery of the much needed assistance.
7 The Geneva II meeting must be attended and supported by all relevant parties in a way that genuinely meets the social aspirations of the Syrian people based on justice for the dispossessed, displaced and oppressed. [ed notes click link for whole article..
Canada's backroom role in Syria, Iraq Featured Guest(s): Yves Engler April 1st, 2013: - Listen | Download
Canada is funding the Gulf monarchies who are funnelling militants into Syria, and U.S. intelligence is involved with the rebels. The dominant media in North America neglects an honest discussion of the Western role. Canada's political opposition neglects Security Council agreements that could allow a demilitarized international forum to mediate the conflict.Engler also discusses opposition to Enbridge pipeline, and its possibility of derailing the Harper government. By taking such a hard stand on environmental issues, and pulling out of Kyoto, Harper is running out of feet to shoot.
 Myths can hurt: On Canadian 'peacekeeping' http://rabble.ca/news/2013/06/myths-can-hurt-on-canadian-peacekeeping By Yves Engler
 In a recent article, Green Party of Canada leader Elizabeth May wrote: "Sadly, under Stephen Harper, the role of our diplomatic corps has been de-emphasized with embassies closing, diplomats treated as irrelevant, and Canada's respect for multilateralism itself called into question. Our role as peacemakers, a role invented by former Prime Minister Lester Pearson, has also fallen."Days earlier the president of the Rideau Institute, Steven Staples, co-authored a column in the Ottawa Citizen decrying the current government's lack of commitment to "peacekeeping." It noted: "Lester B. Pearson was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for promoting 'peacekeeping,' as it came to be known, a project that helped to define our national identity and character."In a major international affairs speech in Montrรฉal last February the leader of the official opposition, Tom Mulcair, focused on how Harper was breaking with Pearson's purported legacy. He repeated a variation of his claim that "Lester Pearson was a model for what Canada has done in the past and should be doing today." If Mulcair actually believes this statement -- he likely knows no more about Pearson's foreign-policy legacy than the myth of 'peacekeeper' -- the NDP leader has a lot to defend.Pearson's record speaks for itself:-He had Canada deliver weapons to the French to put down the Algerian and Vietnamese independence movements.-Asked in Parliament, Pearson refused to call for Nelson Mandela's release from prison.-Pearson backed the mid-1950s CIA coups in Iran and Guatemala.-He incited individuals to destroy a Canadian peace group after it called for the outlawing of nuclear weapons.-Pearson threatened to quit as external affairs minister if Canada failed to deploy ground troops to Korea.-Most controversially, he agreed to have Canada's representatives to the International Control Commission for Vietnam spy for the U.S. and deliver their bombing threats to the North Vietnamese leadership. 
[ed notes;click link for whole piece.. then see.. Black Book of Canadian Foreign Policy - Yves Engler - YouTube


Impunity Inc. Reflections on the “super-rights” and “super-powers” of corporate capital http://www.tni.org/sites/www.tni.org/files/download/impunity_inc_0.pdf
Forty years after Salvador Allende(overthrown and assassinated by cia) denounced corporate power at the United Nations General Assembly (December 1972), millions of people all over the world are involved in struggles against the social and environmental injustice generated by transnational corporations.Working together or in parallel, in multiple ways, and in all sectors of the economy, people are defending their territories, seeds, water, forests, food, biodiversity, health, culture, etc., from the aggressive actions of the transnational corporations, which expand their power in a system of “accumulation by dispossession.”
Impunity Inc. is a report produced as part of the Global Campaign to Dismantle Corporate Power and Stop Impunity. Through three case studies, it aims to provide inputs for reflection on the “super-rights” and “super-powers” of transnational corporations. The report describes the abuses and violations of fundamental labour rights taking place on a day-to-day basis in the export-oriented garment factories in Morocco, highlighting the responsibility of the Spanish transnational Inditex. It outlines a similar situation in Nicaragua, focusing on the role of Pescanova. In both cases, it explains how all this occurs in the framework of the Association Agreements imposed by the European Union (EU), in a context where Lex Mercatoria and the protection of corporate interests continue to take priority over the basic needs of human beings. The report also looks at Europe’s social metabolism, examining the consequences of the EU’s substantial dependence on the increasingly strategic raw materials that it imports from impoverished countries. The cases of zinc mining in Bolivia, coal mining in Colombia and cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo, together with soya and sugar cane production in Argentina and Brazil, are used to illustrate the harmful impact of Glencore’s operations, analysing the extent to which trade agreements ensure the impunity of the large corporations. Glencore’s involvement in financial speculation on commodities is also described. Impunity Inc. then goes on to look at the physical scaffolding of free trade, focusing on the roll-out of the infrastructure mega-projects in South America (IIRSA-COSIPLAN), and highlighting the European Investment Bank (EIB) involvement, as well as European capital’s responsibility in these infrastructure projects and their financialisation. A separate section is devoted to the case of the mega-dams being built on the River Madeira in the Amazon, with the participation of Banco Santander, GDF-Suez, Abengoa, Voith, Siemens and other European companies.
SAMPLE:  Chapter 2 delves into Europe’s social metabolism to examine the EU’s substantial dependence on the import of increasingly strategic raw materials from impoverished countries. It describes the structure of exports from South America and Africa to Europe and how this keeps these countries in the role of primary commodity exporters and thus in poverty. Emphasising that raw materials are important to capital not only from the metabolic point of view but also on the business side, the chapter describes how European companies are consolidating their monopoly position and their control of the international trade in raw materials. They use Europe as a political platform to ensure that their interests are defended through its “raw materials diplomacy,” but it is also the destination for their products. This is why they are particularly interested in maintaining the model of consumption and capitalist production that currently prevails in the EU. By examining Glencore’s mining operations in Colombia, Bolivia and the Democratic Republic of Congo, on which the EU’s metabolism depends, the chapter describes how a giant transnational like this is able to obtain enormous profits while also provoking serious social and environmental conflicts. A review of its activities in MERCOSUR countries, where it has taken over thousands of hectares of fertile land, provides evidence of Glencore’s control over practically the entire chain of production, under the “vertical integration” model imposed by agribusiness. When Free Trade Agreements, EPAs and AAs are placed under the microscope as they relate to this company, it becomes clear how they benefit it and only serve to increase its hegemony and impunity. Finally, the chapter describes Glencore’s operations in different areas of the economy, focusing on its role in financial speculation on commodities.

Reflections on the “super-rights” and “super-powers” of corporate capital

Observatorio de la Deuda en la Globalitzaciรณn (ODG) & Transnational Institute (TNI)

Forty years after Salvador Allende denounced corporate power at the United Nations General Assembly (December 1972), millions of people all over the world are involved in struggles against the social and environmental injustice generated by transnational corporations. Working together or in parallel, in multiple ways, and in all sectors of the economy, people are defending their territories, seeds, water, forests, food, biodiversity, health, culture, etc., from the aggressive actions of the transnational corporations, which expand their power in a system of “accumulation by dispossession.” - See more at: http://www.bilaterals.org/spip.php?article23385#sthash.Gilqjk89.dpuf

Impunity Inc.
Reflections on the “super-rights” and “super-powers” of corporate capital

Observatorio de la Deuda en la Globalitzaciรณn (ODG) & Transnational Institute (TNI)

Forty years after Salvador Allende denounced corporate power at the United Nations General Assembly (December 1972), millions of people all over the world are involved in struggles against the social and environmental injustice generated by transnational corporations. Working together or in parallel, in multiple ways, and in all sectors of the economy, people are defending their territories, seeds, water, forests, food, biodiversity, health, culture, etc., from the aggressive actions of the transnational corporations, which expand their power in a system of “accumulation by dispossession.”
Impunity Inc. is a report produced as part of the Global Campaign to Dismantle Corporate Power and Stop Impunity. Through three case studies, it aims to provide inputs for reflection on the “super-rights” and “super-powers” of transnational corporations.
The report describes the abuses and violations of fundamental labour rights taking place on a day-to-day basis in the export-oriented garment factories in Morocco, highlighting the responsibility of the Spanish transnational Inditex. It outlines a similar situation in Nicaragua, focusing on the role of Pescanova. In both cases, it explains how all this occurs in the framework of the Association Agreements imposed by the European Union (EU), in a context where Lex Mercatoria and the protection of corporate interests continue to take priority over the basic needs of human beings. The report also looks at Europe’s social metabolism, examining the consequences of the EU’s substantial dependence on the increasingly strategic raw materials that it imports from impoverished countries. The cases of zinc mining in Bolivia, coal mining in Colombia and cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo, together with soya and sugar cane production in Argentina and Brazil, are used to illustrate the harmful impact of Glencore’s operations, analysing the extent to which trade agreements ensure the impunity of the large corporations. Glencore’s involvement in financial speculation on commodities is also described. Impunity Inc. then goes on to look at the physical scaffolding of free trade, focusing on the roll-out of the infrastructure mega-projects in South America (IIRSA-COSIPLAN), and highlighting the European Investment Bank (EIB) involvement, as well as European capital’s responsibility in these infrastructure projects and their financialisation. A separate section is devoted to the case of the mega-dams being built on the River Madeira in the Amazon, with the participation of Banco Santander, GDF-Suez, Abengoa, Voith, Siemens and other European companies…
- See more at: http://www.bilaterals.org/spip.php?article23385#sthash.Gilqjk89.dpuf


Impunity Inc.
Reflections on the “super-rights” and “super-powers” of corporate capital

Observatorio de la Deuda en la Globalitzaciรณn (ODG) & Transnational Institute (TNI)

Forty years after Salvador Allende denounced corporate power at the United Nations General Assembly (December 1972), millions of people all over the world are involved in struggles against the social and environmental injustice generated by transnational corporations. Working together or in parallel, in multiple ways, and in all sectors of the economy, people are defending their territories, seeds, water, forests, food, biodiversity, health, culture, etc., from the aggressive actions of the transnational corporations, which expand their power in a system of “accumulation by dispossession.”
Impunity Inc. is a report produced as part of the Global Campaign to Dismantle Corporate Power and Stop Impunity. Through three case studies, it aims to provide inputs for reflection on the “super-rights” and “super-powers” of transnational corporations.
The report describes the abuses and violations of fundamental labour rights taking place on a day-to-day basis in the export-oriented garment factories in Morocco, highlighting the responsibility of the Spanish transnational Inditex. It outlines a similar situation in Nicaragua, focusing on the role of Pescanova. In both cases, it explains how all this occurs in the framework of the Association Agreements imposed by the European Union (EU), in a context where Lex Mercatoria and the protection of corporate interests continue to take priority over the basic needs of human beings. The report also looks at Europe’s social metabolism, examining the consequences of the EU’s substantial dependence on the increasingly strategic raw materials that it imports from impoverished countries. The cases of zinc mining in Bolivia, coal mining in Colombia and cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo, together with soya and sugar cane production in Argentina and Brazil, are used to illustrate the harmful impact of Glencore’s operations, analysing the extent to which trade agreements ensure the impunity of the large corporations. Glencore’s involvement in financial speculation on commodities is also described. Impunity Inc. then goes on to look at the physical scaffolding of free trade, focusing on the roll-out of the infrastructure mega-projects in South America (IIRSA-COSIPLAN), and highlighting the European Investment Bank (EIB) involvement, as well as European capital’s responsibility in these infrastructure projects and their financialisation. A separate section is devoted to the case of the mega-dams being built on the River Madeira in the Amazon, with the participation of Banco Santander, GDF-Suez, Abengoa, Voith, Siemens and other European companies…
- See more at: http://www.bilaterals.org/spip.php?article23385#sthash.Gilqjk89.dpuf
Impunity Inc.
Reflections on the “super-rights” and “super-powers” of corporate capital

Observatorio de la Deuda en la Globalitzaciรณn (ODG) & Transnational Institute (TNI)

Forty years after Salvador Allende denounced corporate power at the United Nations General Assembly (December 1972), millions of people all over the world are involved in struggles against the social and environmental injustice generated by transnational corporations. Working together or in parallel, in multiple ways, and in all sectors of the economy, people are defending their territories, seeds, water, forests, food, biodiversity, health, culture, etc., from the aggressive actions of the transnational corporations, which expand their power in a system of “accumulation by dispossession.”
Impunity Inc. is a report produced as part of the Global Campaign to Dismantle Corporate Power and Stop Impunity. Through three case studies, it aims to provide inputs for reflection on the “super-rights” and “super-powers” of transnational corporations.
The report describes the abuses and violations of fundamental labour rights taking place on a day-to-day basis in the export-oriented garment factories in Morocco, highlighting the responsibility of the Spanish transnational Inditex. It outlines a similar situation in Nicaragua, focusing on the role of Pescanova. In both cases, it explains how all this occurs in the framework of the Association Agreements imposed by the European Union (EU), in a context where Lex Mercatoria and the protection of corporate interests continue to take priority over the basic needs of human beings. The report also looks at Europe’s social metabolism, examining the consequences of the EU’s substantial dependence on the increasingly strategic raw materials that it imports from impoverished countries. The cases of zinc mining in Bolivia, coal mining in Colombia and cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo, together with soya and sugar cane production in Argentina and Brazil, are used to illustrate the harmful impact of Glencore’s operations, analysing the extent to which trade agreements ensure the impunity of the large corporations. Glencore’s involvement in financial speculation on commodities is also described. Impunity Inc. then goes on to look at the physical scaffolding of free trade, focusing on the roll-out of the infrastructure mega-projects in South America (IIRSA-COSIPLAN), and highlighting the European Investment Bank (EIB) involvement, as well as European capital’s responsibility in these infrastructure projects and their financialisation. A separate section is devoted to the case of the mega-dams being built on the River Madeira in the Amazon, with the participation of Banco Santander, GDF-Suez, Abengoa, Voith, Siemens and other European companies…
- See more at: http://www.bilaterals.org/spip.php?article23385#sthash.Gilqjk89.dpuf
Monsanto Refuses to Testify at Seed Hearing in Puerto Rico Carmelo Ruiz-Marrero
Monsanto has refused to testify at a major government hearing about the development and sale of seeds in Puerto Rico. At stake is the research that the company conducts into genetic engineering on the island that critics say threaten the environment and can cause serious human health problems
.This is not the first time local officials have targeted Monsanto. On April 22, senators Marรญa de Lourdes Santiago of the Puerto Rico Independence Party, and Larry Seilhamer of the New Progressive Party, introduced Senate Bill 524, which would mandate the labeling of foods with genetically modified content sold on the island. The Senate Health Committee is expected to hold hearings on this bill later this year.Monsanto has also been embroiled in a legal controversy over the fact it plants crops on 1,500 acres, despite the fact that Puerto Rico's 1952 constitution prohibits agricultural landholdings larger than 500 acres. http://www.80grados.net/tus-contribuciones-enriquecen-a-monsanto/ In May, Puerto Rico Agriculture Secretary Myrna Comas, a well known food security scholar, referred this matter to the Puerto Rico Justice Department, requesting a legal opinion."It is our duty to monitor the food health of our people. If we are given evidence regarding some effect on the island we'll take it into consideration," Comas said in a radio interview.Local media reports have pointed out the irony that despite the fact that Monsanto is in apparent violation of the Puerto Rico constitution, it has received $4.9 million in subsidies from the local Agriculture Department to help it cover payroll expenses from 2006 to 2013.The Puerto Rico Department of Agriculture and Juan Santiago-Cabรกn, operations manager of Monsanto in Puerto Rico, did not respond to CorpWatch's interview requests.Meanwhile local farmers have publicly rallied to the cause. An April 24 event to induct Monsanto, the global leader in seed sales and biotechnology, into the Puerto Rico Agricultural Hall of Fame, became the target of protest by local farmers who are angry about the company's role in developing genetically modified crops on large plots of land on the island.The Hall of Fame was set up by Acciรณn y Reforma Agrรญcola (ARA), a farm lobby group founded by agribusinessman Pedro Vivoni, who owns Agro Servicios, a farm supply company. (Monsanto represents 18 percent of Agro Servicios' business, according to coverage by the local media). The Hall of Fame has been endorsed by the Agronomists Association (Colegio de Agrรณnomos) and the Agriculture Department of Puerto Rico, which gave ARA a $5,000 donation earlier this year.“It is totally unacceptable on the part of an organization that represents agronomists and farmers to name Monsanto to the Puerto Rico Agriculture Hall of Fame, a company that sues farmers all over the world and has contributed to the destruction of the world's agricultural biodiversity,” said the activists in a statement presented by various scientific, student and farming organizations, including the local chapter of the Latin American Scientific Society of Agroecology (SOCLA)


Zionist IsraHelli Judge Theodor Meron absolves military leaders of crimes against humanity
 http://www.voltairenet.org/article179130.html
 In Rwanda, the National Commission for the Fight against Genocide and, in Slovenia, the International Institute for Middle-East and Balkan Studies (IFIMES) demand the suspension of Judge Theodor Meron, President of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and Presiding Judge of the Appeals Chambers, International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda.Under his auspices, international tribunals have profoundly modified their jurisprudence. They have ceased to condemn military leaders for crimes committed by their subordinates, of which they were aware and yet failed to take disciplinary action against. The courts now consider that the hierarchical superiors can be condemned only if their "direct intent" to commit these crimes can be established.In the opinion of dissenting Danish judge, Frederik Harhoff, who on 6 June sent an e-mail to his colleagues (see below), this change was made ​​under pressure from the U.S. and Israeli military who are nervous at the prospect of one day being held accountable for their responsibilities.Judge Theodor Meron, 83, was successively a Polish, Israeli and U.S. citizen.[[[[[ He was legal adviser to the Israeli government and Israeli ambassador to Canada and the United Nations.]]]] He acquired U.S. citizenship and became the president of the international bar association.
[ed notes;click link to read the dissenting opinion by other judge Fredrick..then also see.. Israeli Arms Sales to Rwandan Genocidaires Should Not Be Surprising 
http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/6229/israeli-arms-sales-to-rwandan-genocidaires-should-
The ‘MENA’ region and the International Monetary Fund http://londonprogressivejournal.com/article/view/1474/the-mena-region-and-the-international-monetary-fund  To understand what is currently happening in Syria it’s also necessary to see what Syria was like before 2011. What was Syria like before, politically and economically? There, we find Western European and US leadership circles focusing on the MENA region (Middle East/North Africa). We find a series of sanctions placed on Syria by the US/EU nexus. We find the International Monetary Fund continuously demanding uniform economic policies, drawing those countries and regions into its financial system. We find the IMF waiting for its opportunity to move in. Syria before 2011 Syria, like Iraq, Libya and Iran, had followed an economic model that was more state-centered. Syria established a central bank, rather than banks that are subsidiaries of large international consortiums. Syria maintained subsidization policies providing low cost food items and transportation petrol, heating and cooking fuel, along with low cost or free university education and health care, public transportation. Whatever other internal policies have been deemed repressive by certain segments of the population, it is clear that many economic policies, state-directed, had provided support in terms of basic and beyond-basic services to millions.Though exporting less oil in comparison to other countries in the MENA region (e.g. Libya, Iraq and Iran), Syria’s oil industry has still accounted for anywhere between 16 to 25% of its budgetary income over the years, with Germany, France, Italy and the Netherlands among its customers. To finance infrastructural projects, Syria had borrowed monies from Eastern European countries and strategic-partner Russia, as well as Western Europe and from IMF-brokered loans and US aid for infrastructural projects in the hundreds of millions of dollars in the 1970s and 1980s when Syria was run by Bashar al-Asad’s father, Hafez al-Asad. But, in contrast to many other countries of the world ranked as ‘lower middle income countries’ by the IMF, Syria was able to avoid the deep sinkhole of debilitating and long term debt. The reason for this lies with Syria over the years receiving aid-grants from Libya, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, which it did not have to pay back. The largest amount Syria owed was to the Soviet Union, now Russia, where 80% of its $13 billion debt was written off by Russia in 2005. [1]

In fact, Syria has managed to steadily reduce its ‘long term external debt’, according to a recent World Bank report, from a 1995 high of $16.995 billion to a turn-around drop in 2005 to $ 5.007 billion, mostly due to the Russian write off of 80% of Syria’s debt, to the 2010 figure of $ 4.171 billion. But what is most interesting is that in the category labeled ‘use of IMF credit’ in this same report, all that can be seen are a row of zeros from 1995 to 2010, meaning that Syria did not rely on the IMF for any loans for that fifteen year period. [2] Syria, like Iran and Libya, is not beholden to the IMF/World Bank for any loans, which would seem to be an unusual phenomenon in our present era of ‘globalization’.
US and Western Pressures on Syria and the MENA countries

In one form or another, Syria and other MENA countries such as Libya, Iraq and Iran have been subjected to intense political and military pressures which have been both covertly and overtly engineered by the US and certain allied countries. It was the Neocon planners’ focus on the Middle East prior to the 9/11 event in 2001 (e.g. the US-based ‘Energy Infrastructure Planning Group’ or EIPG), which led to the US invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, followed by US sponsorship and arming of opposition forces in Libya and Syria, intense and widespread sanctions policies on Iran backed by the EU, the Gulf sheikdoms and Turkey, and continuous military actions and threats by the US and Israel.The US has aggressively applied and advocated continuous sanctions policies against Syria for its military and political presence in Lebanon up to 2005. Yet, it has been internationally agreed upon and recognized that Syria had played a stabilizing role in Lebanon when various armed factions, some aligned with Israel in its invasion of that country in 1982, had created absolute chaos and destruction, including the massacre of Palestinian men, women and children in the refugee camps of Sabra and Shatilla by the Phalangists. It was the presence of the Syrian armed forces that helped to stabilize the country after 15 years of war, beginning in 1975 and ending in 1990. [3]
But these rationalizations cover up the actual goal of internationally-based institutions and elites for certain desired economic outcomes. Economic pressures have been applied to Syria for some time, intersecting with the other pressures applied to this country. Two months before the US invasion of Iraq in March 2003, the US continued its pressure on Syria when Congress passed in January the ‘Syria Accountability and Lebanese Sovereignty Restoration Act’, condemning Syria’s political and military presence in Lebanon. The US led the way in 2005 in targeting Syria’s nationalized bank, the Commercial Bank of Syria; by specifically placing this bank under sanctions, which was added onto the US Patriot Act. The US charged that the bank was involved in ‘money laundering’; a charge usually associated with gangster-like financial activity and that could just as easily be applied to banks in the Americas needing to be investigated, which would of course include US banks, within an atmosphere of immense profits being created by the narcotics industry using front companies or personalities to open accounts. But in the case of Syria, the money laundering charge was levied against the Syrian government for accounts that were tied to regional and well known political players Hamas and Hezbollah, both branded as ‘terrorist’ organizations by the US, but which are in opposition to US and Israeli actions and policies in the region. The charge, then, can be clearly seen to be politically motivated.

[ed notes:click link for whole article..