Sunday, March 15, 2009
The Case Against Israel's "Right To Exist"http://atheonews.blogspot.com/2009/03/case-against-israels-right-to-exist.html
The Case Against Israel's "Right To Exist"
So let us examine this curious notion that Israel has some sort of inherent "right to exist," a claim that no other nation-state has ever felt it necessary to make. We would all agree that human beings have a right to exist, although there are many who would make an exception for those who commit murder. Some even go further and say that all sentient beings have a right to exist, but only in this one peculiar case is there this insistence that a particular nation-state has such an inalienable right. Why is that? Is it, perhaps, because in this particular case the contention is on particularly shaky ground? Sorry, but methinks the lady protesteth too much.
Afghan police say victims of U.S. raid not militantshttp://mobile.reuters.com/mobile/m/FullArticle/p.rdt/CTOP/ntopNews_uUSTRE52D0KA20090314
Afghan police disputed whether five men killed in a raid by U.S. and Afghan troops on Saturday were militants
Rosen, along with his slick defense lawyer Abbe Lowell and pro-AIPAC Judge T.S. Ellis III, constitute a formidable force against Washingtons efforts to curb AIPACs power, and in favor of Israels determination to subvert U.S. policyhttp://usa.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/60552
No comments:
Post a Comment