march 11, 2004 in madrid: was it really an islamist attack?www.voltairenet.org/article163076.html
The explosives expert in charge of deactivating it testified in court that this "shoddy piece of work" did not match the complexity of the rest of the device [6].http://especiales.libertaddigital.com/11-m/transcripcion.php?id=19-03-2007---01There is also an essential difference between the composition of this bomb and those that did explode.The Vallecas backpack contained 640 grams of screws and nails intended to serve as shrapnel. However, autopsies revealed that none of the victims had been struck by metal projectileshttp://www.libertaddigital.com/nacional/ni-clavos-ni-tuercas-ni-tornillos-no-habia-metralla-entre-nuestros-191-muertos-1276321976/And, according to the police who handled them, the two bombs defused on the morning of March 11 contained no such projectiles. What motivated the terrorists to put shrapnel in just one of the bombs? And finally, the circumstances of the discovery of the Vallecas backpack are unclear.During the trial, explosives experts explained that they had searched all the objects left in the train cars four times and confirmed that it was impossible that the found bomb had been among them http://especiales.libertaddigital.com/11-m/transcripcion.php?id=14-03-2007---04([8] Testimony of Madrid’s chief explosives disposal expert, protected witness #28296, March 14, 2007. "What I am totally convinced of is that after the search carried out by the TEDAX who worked there, there was not a single backpack containing an explosive device. And I can assure you of that.")Its origin is even more doubtful because the abandoned objects, among which the bomb was purportedly found, were moved 3 times throughout the day of March 11, not always under the best surveillancehttp://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2007/03/21/espana/1174437275.html([9] "La fiscal prescinde del testigo clave de la custodia de la mochila de Vallecas" (Prosecutor ignores key witness on custody of Vallecas backpack), El Mundo, March 21, 2007.)and ended up at the Vallecas police station, contrary to what the judge had ordered. If one adds to this the conflicting testimony about when it was discovered http://www.casadellibro.com/libro-enigmas-del-11-m-conspiracion-o-negligencia/1069132/2900001098268([10] Los enigmas del 11M (The enigmas of March 11), by Luis del Pino (LibrosLibres, 2006), Chapter 24, "Llamame"http://www.libertaddigital.com/opinion/24-llamame-30692/ (Call me).the fact that the bomb was not mentioned in the inventories of abandoned objects[11] Verdict (2007), page 517: "The truth is that, as emphasized by several parties, the sports bag containing the explosive does not appear on that document."and the fact that there are no photos of the bomb before the time that it was dismantled, the inconsistency of such evidence becomes clear. Notwithstanding all this, the court used it as a key element in rendering its verdict.
Blair lied and lied again: Mandarins reveal that 10 days before Iraq invasion PM knew Saddam couldn't use WMDshttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1230824/Iraq-fourth-WMD-risk-list-inquiry-hears.html
Deceitful CRU Works For Corporate World Revolution - Supported by the UK´s and New Zealand´s Governmentshttp://euro-med.dk/?cat=5
The climate deception is now an exposed global conspiracy The New Zealand Climate Science Coalition: We have discovered that the warming in New Zealand over the past 156 years was indeed man-made, but it had nothing to do with emissions of CO2—it was created by man-made adjustments of the temperature. It’s a disgrace.
Here are 5 alleged e-mails from the Futerra-CRU-traffic. A Futerra document is said to have been found among the CRU documents hacked recently. InformationLiberation: "The document included within the climategate treasure-chest is called 'Rules of the Game' and shows deliberate deception on the part of this agency to ensure that the debate would indeed be perceived as being settled. When facts do not convince, they reasoned, let us appeal to emotions in order to get the job done." Be this document among the hacked files or not: Documents do confirm, the CRU is closely interwoven with the UK government, as seen from this list of supporters: History of the CRU: Supporters: i.a. Department of Energy, Department of the Environment (DETR, now DEFRA), Department of Health, Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), Environment Agency, Forestry Commission, Greenpeace International, International Institute of Environmental Development (IIED), World Wildlife Fund for Nature (WWF), Shell, British Petroleum, Stockholm Environment Agency, Sultanate of Oman, Tate and Lyle, UK Met. Office, United Nations Environment Plan (UNEP), United States Department of Energy. Futerra and The UK Department for Environment published the Rules of the Game on 7 March 2005.http://www.futerra.co.uk/revolution/leading_thinking
Here is an extract of the “Rules of the Game” Why were the principles created? The game is communicating climate change; the rules will help us win it. These principles were created as part of the UK Climate Change Communications Strategy, an evidence-based strategy aiming to change public attitudes towards climate change in the UK. This is a ‘short version’ of a far longer document of evidence.http://www.defra.gov.uk/ One ‘überprinciple’ emerged: “Changing attitudes towards climate change is not like selling a particular brand of soap – it’s like convincing someone to use soap in the first place.” These principles are a first step to using sophisticated behaviour change modelling and comprehensive evidence from around the world to change attitudes towards climate change. We need to think radically, and the Rules of the Game are a sign that future campaigns will not be ‘business as usual’. This is a truly exciting moment.2. Forget the climate change detractors. Those who deny climate change science are irritating, but unimportant. The argument is not about if we should deal with climate change, but how we should deal with climate change.4. Once we’ve eliminated the myths, there is room for some new ideas. These principles relate to some of the key ideas emerging from behaviour change modelling for sustainable development.6. Use both peripheral and central processing Attracting direct attention to an issue can change attitudes, but peripheral messages can be just as effective.8. Use transmitters and social learning People – learn through social interaction, and some people are better teachers and trendsetters than others. Targeting these people will ensure that messages seem more trustworthy and are transmitted more effectively.
Futerra founder, Ed Gillespie, The Guardian 20 Nov. 2009http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2009/nov/20/polar-bears-plane-stupidDo shock tactics actually work to shift the public's attitudes and behaviours? Conventional psychological theory suggests that shock ads used to work because their message wormed its way so deeply into our consciousness that we're eventually compelled to act on it. However I'm still not sure it will change behaviour, the danger is that by pumping up the high octane drama of an ad, you increase the risk of viewers feeling manipulated and dismissing it as pure propaganda.
Congressmen Denouncing U.N. Inquiry Receive Handsome Donations from Pro-Israel Lobbyhttp://www.opensecrets.org/news/2009/11/congressmen-denoncing-un-inqui.html
The members of the House who voted in favor of the resolution have received $51,260 more on average from pro-Israel organizations ($81,020 versus $29,770) since 1989 than those who opposed it, the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics has found. Those who opposed the measure have collected $15,760 more, on average, from pro-Arab groups in that time than those who supported the bill ($16,360 versus $600).
the westerners at the gates of latin america, againhttp://usa.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/68806
Brains Benefit from Multilingualismhttp://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091029151807.htm
For a considerable time already there has been discussion within scientific circles about whether knowing and using multiple languages could possibly have positive effects on the human brain and thinking. There have been a number of international studies on the subject, which indicate that the ability to use more than one language brings an individual a considerable advantage
Cars burn in Geneva as police, protesters clash ahead of WTO http://rawstory.com/2009/11/cars-burn-police-protesters-clash-geneva-wto-conference/ Police, protesters clash ahead of WTO conferencehttp://www.france24.com/en/node/4935806
Rothschild appointed to help sell Dubai World assetshttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/businesslatestnews/6673264/Rothschild-appointed-to-help-sell-Dubai-World-assets.html
Sneaky: Current credit bailout bill contains carbon tax provisions!http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/10/02/sneaky-current-credit-bailout-bill-contains-carbon-tax-provisions/
If you look at page 180 of the 451-page monster bailout bill that easily passed the Senate yesterday (PDF here), you will see that it includes at Section 116 language about the tax treatment of “industrial source carbon dioxide.” It also provides, at Section 117, for a “carbon audit of the tax code.” What could a provision about the tax treatment of “industrial source carbon dioxide” and another provision about doing a “carbon audit” of the tax code possibly have to do with restoring confidence in Wall Street’s troubled credit and banking markets? The answer: NOTHING. This appears to be an attempt by global warming alarmists to lay the foundation for a carbon tax in the middle of another crisis, hoping nobody will notice. Tarpley - Obama And His Afghan Adventureshttp://eclipptv.com/viewVideo.php?video_id=8603
9/11: Pentagon Aircraft Hijack Impossible, Flight Deck Door Closed for Entire Flighthttp://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=18405
Newly decoded data provided by an independent researcher and computer programmer from Australia exposes alarming evidence that the reported hijacking aboard American Airlines Flight 77 was impossible to have existed. A data parameter labeled "FLT DECK DOOR", cross checks with previously decoded data obtained by Pilots For 9/11 Truth from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) through the Freedom Of Information Act.
IAEA rejects own reports, purpose, Non-Proliferation Treaty: Orwellian vote condemns compliant Iranhttp://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner~y2009m11d28-IAEA-rejects-own-reports-purpose-NonProliferation-Treaty-Orwellian-vote-condemns-compliant-Iran
Geneva WTO Protests 2009 (PHOTOS): Police Clash With Black Bloc Demonstratorshttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/28/geneva-wto-protests-2009-_n_372855.html
Under cover of their illegality, polling stations open in Hondurashttp://www.telesurtv.net/noticias/secciones/nota/62646-NN/enmarcadas-en-la-ilegalidad-abren-mesas-electorales-en-honduras/
The elections in Honduras have been rejected by the majority of the international community, as they are framed into illegality by the non-return of the constitutional president, Manuel Zelaya.From this Saturday, the organizations defending Human Rights in Honduras have denounced the military regime Roberto Micheletti are forcing the civilian population of the frontier departments to go to the polls for the election illegal."We can not participate in elections until it is restored to President Zelaya," said independent candidate, Carlos H. Reyes, to decline to participate in the "farce" for not legalizing the coup.The Resistance Front against the coup of Honduras issued a call for "no vote" on Sunday in elections that are conducted under a coup by the de facto government of Roberto Micheletti.The United Nations Organization (UNO) and the Organization of American States (OAS) announced they will not send election observers, while the U.S. has openly expressed his support for the elections.Among the countries that had supported the coup in Honduras, are Peru, Panama, Costa Rica, U.S. and Israel
Israel joins the governments of Panama, Peru, USA and Costa Rica, who decided to officially support an electoral process that has been rejected by most of the international community.Israeli Ambassador Eliahu Lopez in Honduras, reported Saturday that the government of that country supports the controversial elections that will take place in the Central American nation and the winner resulting from these, because they think the process is the right way to move forward. " U.S. reaffirms support for''free elections''and''fair''Honduranhttp://www.telesurtv.net/noticias/secciones/nota/62611-NN/eeuu-ratifica-respaldo-a-las-elecciones-libres-y-justas-hondurenas/
The U.S. government (USA) confirmed on Friday its support for the elections held illegal de facto authorities in Honduras, and considered that as an opportunity "only" to restore constitutional order in the nation, torn from the coup d'etat against the legitimate President Manuel ZelayaThe U.S. government justified its support for the elections after stating that the Honduran electoral process began "well before" June 28, the day when the legitimate president, Manuel Zelaya, was overthrown by a coup. The White House obvious that elections, in addition to being organized by usurping authorities will be developed under a state of national emergency and with a large military presence, as the newspaper reported Wednesday Time. A total of 16 thousand army troops, 14 thousand policemen and five thousand 500 reservists will be deployed throughout the country before, during and after the elections. To that scenario, we add the declaration of a state of national emergency by the de facto authorities, as the paper said. U.S. argues that candidates participate in elections "legitimate" parties representing a long tradition of "democracy". Meanwhile, independent candidate, Carlos H. Reyes resigned to participate in the charade for not legalizing the coup. "We can not participate in elections until it is restored to President Zelaya" Reyes said.The election has been rejected by much of the international community, after denouncing the lack of guarantees for its implementation. The United Nations Organization (UNO) and the Organization of American States (OAS) announced they will not send election observers, while the U.S. has openly expressed his support for the elections
US Grand Strategy requires compliance by Obama and puppets such as Abu Mazenhttp://usa.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/68830
No comments:
Post a Comment