Reviewing Obama’s New National Security Strategy: Hypocrisy, Imperialism, and Eye Candy http://www.zcommunications.org/reviewing-obama-s-new-national-security-strategy-hypocrisy-imperialism-and-eye-candy-by-michael-mcgehee

President Obama says the NPT is “sound” and much like Gandhi’s response to a question on what he though of Western Democracy, my response to Obama’s rhetoric about having the signatories held accountable to ensure they meet their obligations is a “good idea.” Maybe he should start with us? And that’s the problem. He says so long as there are nuclear weapons we should “enhance” ours “to defeat asymmetric threats, preserve access to the global commons, and strengthen partners.”

Are you getting this? He claims to be for a nuclear weapons free world yet he uses their existence to justify enhancing them in order to bully the world so we and our friends can pillage. We are 5% of the world yet we account for nearly 50% of global military expenditures. We have nearly a thousand foreign bases. The asymmetry exists and I doubt Obama is clueless to where we stand especially since he has already noted we are an “unmatched military" that continues to "underwrite global security.”

comment-we do not agree with all writer says,espcially part where america is a classless society....not true!!!unless he was being sarcastic...