PEACE BE UNTO ALL THE TRUTHERS,SEEK KNOWLEDGE FROM CRADLE TO GRAVE

''MAKE SURE TO ALWAYS CLICK ''OLDER POSTS''AS FRONT PAGE DOES NOT CONTAIN '' FULL CONTENTS OF DAILY POSTS AND UPDATES''


Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Questioning the Syrian "Casualty List"
by Sharmine Narwani   http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2012/narwani280212.html "Perception is 100 percent of politics," the old adage goes.  Say something three, five, seven times, and you start to believe it in the same way you "know" aspirin is good for the heart.

Sometimes, though, perception is a dangerous thing.  In the dirty game of politics, it is the perception -- not the facts -- of an issue that invariably wins the day.
In the case of the raging conflict over Syria, the one fundamental issue that motors the entire international debate on the crisis is the death toll and its corollary: the Syrian casualty list.
The "list" has become widely recognized -- if not specifically, then certainly when the numbers are bandied about: 4,000, 5,000, 6,000 -- sometimes more.  These are not mere numbers; they represent dead Syrians.
But this is where the dangers of perception begin.  There are many competing Syrian casualty lists with different counts -- how does one, for instance gauge if X is an accurate number of deaths?  How have the deaths been verified?  Who verifies them and do they have a vested interest?  Are the dead all civilians?  Are they pro-regime or anti-regime civilians?  Do these lists include the approximately 2,000 dead Syrian security forces?  Do they include members of armed groups?  How does the list-aggregator tell the difference between a civilian and a plain-clothes militia member?
Even the logistics baffle.  How do they make accurate counts across Syria every single day?  A member of the Lebanese fact-finding team investigating the 15 May 2011 shooting deaths of Palestinian protesters by Israelis at the Lebanese border told me that it took them three weeks to discover there were only six fatalities, and not the 11 counted on the day of the incident.  And in that case, the entire confrontation lasted a mere few hours.
How then does one count 20, 40, or 200 casualties in a few hours while conflict continues to rage around them?

[ED NOTES:CLICK LINK FOR REST,JUST POSTING EXCERPTS...

No comments: