The choice between Gadaffi and the Wahhabi-Zionist coalition http://www.islamtimes.org/vdcgtn97.ak9wn4j5ra.html

When the protests erupted in Libya I, like many others, got a bit carried away. We thought this was an expression of popular discontent and democratic aspirations. As the protests turned into armed conflict and eventually into civil war I started to realize that my first impression was wrong...Reliable reports have exposed a strong Wahhabi element in the opposition. Benghazi and the city of Darnah in eastern Libya are known to be hotbeds of Wahhabi militancy. Libya sent more fighters to Iraq per-capita basis than any other Muslim country. Most of them came from the eastern parts. These fighters did not go to Iraq primarily to fight against the American occupation.

Instead there main target was what they perceived as “The Shi’ite government” or in Wahhabi lingo “The Rafidha government”. The majority of the so called “mujahideen” who came to Iraq came from Saudi Arabia, the homeland of Wahhabism, in order to kill Shi’ites. Their struggle has got nothing to do with “jihad” or “resistance”.How about the Zionists forces? The Zionist leadership of the Western powers and the Zionist bankers that run the world economy want to lay their hands on Libyan oil and gas. Further, they want to privatize The Central Bank of Libya that is currently state owned. The new bank of Benghazi is private, owned by Zionists. To the Zionists the Wahhabi fighters are just useful idiots.

Colonel Muammar Gadaffi is an eccentric character, no doubt. But he has popular support. He is not an isolated dictator. The country needs reforms, yes, but what’s going on right now is not about reforms, human rights or political freedoms, it’s simply a Zionist takeover. The Wahhabi militants in Benghazi has already announced that they will recognize Israel if they gain power. Gadaffi is not perfect, I agree, but what is the alternative? Today it’s either Gadaffi or the Wahhabi-Zionist coalition. I choose Gadaffi.