Clare Short: ‘Syria is under attack to weaken Iran’
Clare Short, former British MP and secretary of state for International Development has claimed on her blog that the US-lead war on Syria has nothing to do with “achieving democracy and dignity but to overthrow the regime in order to weaken Iran and Hizbullah.”[[[[“It is deeply hypocritical of Obama, Cameron and the rest to
demand action on the use of chemical weapons because it is a breach of
international law when they will take no action as Israel continues to
breach international law in its behaviour in the occupied territories.
On this we have the 2004 advisory opinion of the International Court of
Justice, the highest authority in the international system on
international law, which makes absolutely clear that Israel is in grave
breach of international law in the occupied territories. The US and the
UK constantly denounce Russia for making impossible Security Council
authorised military action against Syria when the US, almost always
supported by the UK, constantly blocks any action whatsoever to try to
restrain Israel’s breaches of international law in the occupied
territories,”]]]]] said Short.One of Short’s other statements, which offended the British Jewish Lobby (“Freinds of Israel”), was: “It’s
Europe that’s responsible for the historical persecution of the Jews
and the horrendous holocaust, so Europe has a responsibility to heal all
of this.” That amounts to delegitimization of the Zionist entity.
Netanyahu is pushing Obama to attack Syria followed by an attack on
Iran. Israel’s prominent American anti-Muslim propagandists like Abraham
Foxman and Dennis Ross have whined that blocking war on Syria makes an
attack on Iran more necessary.Foxman has urged Obama to attack Iran otherwise the United States would loose its world leadership. Ross claimed in the Jewish Washington Post (September 9, 2013) that president Rouhani’s position “will
inevitably be weakened once it becomes clear that the US cannot use
force against Syria. At that point, paradoxically, the hard-liners in
the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps and around the Supreme Leader will
be able to claim that there is only an economic cost to pursuing
nuclear weapons but no military danger. Their argument will be: Once
Iran has nuclear weapons, it will build its leverage in the region; its
deterrent will be enhanced; and, most importantly, the rest of the world
will see that sanctions have failed, and that it is time to come to
terms with Iran“.Yawn!The Zionist Jew idiot doesn’t realize that under Iran’s
Constitution, only the Supreme Leader has the authority to declare war
or peace and not president Hassan Rouhani.
However, US-based Jewish intelligence agency, Stratfor, on
September 4, 2013 published a analysis, saying that an American military
attack on Syria will further increse Iranian influence in the region.“Conventional wisdom says that a weakened Syria would undermine
Iran’s regional influence, but a US military intervention in the country
could actually benefit Tehran. The government there has devised a
sophisticated strategy for responding to a U.S. attack. Of course,
Tehran would activate its militant proxies in the region, including
Hezbollah, in the event that the United States launches an attack, but
it would also exploit Washington’s visceral opposition to Sunni jihadist
and Islamist groups to gain concessions elsewhere,” said the sudy.
Zelensky’s testing our patience – Slovak MEP
-
RT | December 21, 2024 Vladimir Zelensky has “gone too far” in its dispute
with Slovakia over natural gas, let alone turning Ukraine into a “zombie
state” ...
3 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment