AI: Syrian authorities urged not to suppress 'Great Friday' protests http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m77050&hd=&size=1&l=e
[Why is this guy and his site parroting and ''citing'' imperialist tools like ''amnesty international,a globalist CFR front''?keep in mind just about a week ago when he did i called this to his attention,and showed him my files on Syria and western plots by NED,FREEDOM HOUSE,STATE DEPARTMENT,CFR,NEOCONS AGENDA,AND SEVERAL LEADING DISSIDENTS PARADED THRU WESTERN MEDIA ''A.I'' INCLUDED PUSHING DISINFO ON SYRIA..THEN HE PRESENTED HIMSELF AS ''ANTI IMPERIALIST?
I MIGHT START UP A NEW SITE DEDICATED TO JUST TO EXPOSING AND HIGHLIGHTING THESE FAKE ANTI IMPERIALISTS,AND DOCUMENTINGE ACH CASE WHERE THEY OPENLY EXPOSE THEMSELEVS AS FAR FROM IT,I HAVE QUITE A FEW BLOGS.. IT IS NOTHING TO ME....ILL ERASE ANY TRACES OF CREDIBILITY ANYONE HAS FOR SUCH SHILLS...I TAKE CREDIBILITY AND INTEGRITY SERIOUS...I DONT LIKE GATE KEEPERS,I DESPIZE THEM AND OPENLY EXPOSE THEM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amnesty International http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Amnesty_International
Criticism & AI's Contributions to Disinformation Assessment by a former AI-USA board member Prof. Francis A. Boyle (Professor of International Law, Univ. of Illinois, Champaign) from an interview with Dennis Bernstein:"Amnesty International is primarily motivated not by human rights but by publicity. Second comes money. Third comes getting more members. Fourth, internal turf battles. And then finally, human rights, genuine human rights concerns.
To be sure, if you are dealing with a human rights situation in a country that is at odds with the United States or Britain, it gets an awful lot of attention, resources, man and womanpower, publicity, you name it, they can throw whatever they want at that. But if it's dealing with violations of human rights by the United States, Britain, Israel, then it's like pulling teeth to get them to really do something on the situation. They might, very reluctantly and after an enormous amount of internal fightings and battles and pressures, you name it. But you know, it's not like the official enemies list."
-------------------------------------------
Participation in propaganda campaign leading up to the 1991 Gulf War.There were some curious episodes in the lead up to the 1991 Gulf War. Hill & Knowlton launched a major propaganda campaign [5] to change US citizens’ attitudes about a possible US intervention in Kuwait. Part of this campaign produced the “throwing the babies out of the incubators” hoax presented by the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador in the US. As part of this propaganda campaign President Bush (Senior) appeared on national TV holding a copy of AI’s press release pertaining to the incubator story. It was portrayed as further proof of the incident.
-------------------------------------------------------
Duped Again?During the Balkan wars, AI seems to have pushed yet another propaganda piece used to justify the bombing of Serbia, and to assist Croatia and the Bosnian Muslims. From Diana Johnstone's Fool's Crusade, Pluto Press 2002, p. 8 Buying Humanitarian Bombing?In 1999, AI did not reject and played along when State Dept. officials proposed the "humanitarian bombing of Serbia". When an AI director was asked to explain this decision, she answered "AI is not an anti-war organization"
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Business Ethics? In 1991, AI set up a Amnesty Business Group. It was meant to monitor human rights observance by corporations. However, the curious thing is that it chose Sir Geoffrey Chandler to head this unit. NB: Chandler was a Shell company director, and the head of the Sustainability Council. The second curious aspect of this AI unit is the issuance of a report about a controversial oil pipeline. It is quoted as follows on its website: "Launch of Human Rights on the Line Report into the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline project and the Host Government Agreement between BP and the Turkish Government." Note that this pipeline was beset by controversy because BP overlooked the rights and interests of all the people in the path of the pipeline.
------------------------------------------------------
Not Challenging Apartheid Dennis Bernstein: Now, having said that about these connections between the U.S., British and Amnesty International foreign policy… Francis Boyle: Sure, you’ll see a pretty good coincidence of the enemies that Amnesty International goes after and the interests of both the United States and British governments. Let’s take an older example — apartheid in South Africa under the former criminal regime in South Africa. Amnesty International refused adamantly to condemn apartheid in South Africa
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amnesty International on Behalf of Imperialism http://archives.econ.utah.edu/archives/marxism/1996-02-18.000/msg00000.htm AI: A false beacon? http://www.counterpunch.org/rooij10132004.html How the US State Dept. Recruited Human Rights Groups to Cheer On the Bombing Raids: Those Incubator Babies, Once More? http://student.cs.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/articles/article0005098.html Coup at Amnesty International: Venezuelan Human Rights, Canadian film festivals, and censorship http://www.sdonline.org/36/coupatamnesty.html The Contradictions of Amnesty International http://www.zcommunications.org/znet/viewArticle/17818 "Amnesty International's Track Record in Haiti since 2004 http://www.haitianalysis.com/human-rights
No comments:
Post a Comment