PEACE BE UNTO ALL THE TRUTHERS,SEEK KNOWLEDGE FROM CRADLE TO GRAVE
''MAKE SURE TO ALWAYS CLICK ''OLDER POSTS''AS FRONT PAGE DOES NOT CONTAIN '' FULL CONTENTS OF DAILY POSTS AND UPDATES''
Tuesday, November 8, 2011
ZIONISTS SHOT DOWN!!! Supreme Court hears arguments on Jerusalem passport, immigration removalhttp://jurist.org/paperchase/2011/11/supreme-court-hears-arguments-on-jerusalem-passport-immigration-removal.phpThe US Supreme Court [official website] heard oral arguments [day call, PDF] Monday in two cases. In MBZ v. Clinton [transcript, PDF; JURIST report], the court heard arguments on whether the political question doctrine [Cornell LII backgrounder] deprives a federal court of jurisdiction to enforce a federal statute that explicitly directs the secretary of state how to record the birthplace of an American citizen on a Consular Report of Birth Abroad and on a passport. US citizen Menachem Zivotofsky was born in Jerusalem in 2002. His parents asked the State Department to record his place of birth as Jerusalem, Israel, but were told it could only be listed as Jerusalem because the US does not recognize any country as having sovereignty over Jerusalem. His parents filed suit in 2003, and a federal district court dismissed the suit as a political question. Counsel for the government argued:
The Executive has determined that the passports it issues should not identify Israel as the place of birth for persons born in Jerusalem. Petitioner seeks relief ... that would countermand that executive judgment. But under the Constitution that is an exercise of the Executive's exclusive recognition power. The Constitution commits that power exclusively to the Executive and neither a court nor the Congress can override that judgment.
Counsel for the petitioner said, "I don't think the Court is being asked to decide a question of foreign policy." [I LOVE IT!!!NICE TRY FRAUD ZIONIST SHILLS... The United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) does not recognise Israel's proclamation of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, which is, for example, reflected in the wording of General Assembly Resolution 63/30 of 2009 which states that "any actions taken by Israel, the occupying Power, to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration on the Holy City of Jerusalem are illegal and therefore null and void and have no validity whatsoever, and calls upon Israel to cease all such illegal and unilateral measures." "Resolution adopted by the General Assembly – 63/30. Jerusalem"
i seek no recognition for any info on this blog.all information is purely for informational purposes.its a blog created with the sole intention of relating already well documented facts(and not well known facts)that are for everyone to share.Its in dedication to all the truthers ...